Based Musk.
(media.communities.win)
Comments (9)
sorted by:
I don't know. This whole X thing with Twitter has me wondering. Where's the Fauci files? Its all shut down now? No more? Was his job to create a red herring? Steer us near the truth and then bypass it completely only to bury it?
He still owns the biggest electric vehicle company in the world and wants to put a chip in everyone's brain. He still is wearing that devils armor thing and has a trans son.
Sorry, I have big doubts as of recently. So much fog and deception.
He who controls the past controls the future.
Hell yeah!!
They’re going to use the main stream media stories and footage / lies to write false history. Or they were, that was a plan. Where else would you get material for history books?
a) consider if..."he-brew his-story and jew fell for it" ?
b) suggested words (spell-craft) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound; while suggested letters (symbolism) tempt one to ignore perceivable symmetry.
c) nature doesn't write...those within choose to write.
Most of todays HS History books were written by the communist Howard Zinn. His book 'A People's History of the United States" published in 1980 is used in HS across the country.
I dont have a WSJ account but this quote from a 2019 article is telling.
Look at the wiki and read between the lines:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Zinn
From his biography:
They dont even try to hide his communist beliefs.
a) what if perceivable (inspiration) exists before suggested (information)?
b) what if suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality)?
c) what if matter (life) exists within immaterial (inception towards death)? Notice that while alive...one cannot perceive ones inception and death, hence existing in-between.
a) what if inception towards death represents the "mainstream" for each life within?
b) as perceiving (senses) within perceivable (inspiration)...could the suggestions (information) by others become the MEDIA (Latin medius; middle) if one consents to it?
To understand implies ones consent to "stand under" another's suggestion.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested puts one into a conflict of reason aka affirm versus denial.
a) OB (against) LITTERA (letter)
b) consenting to suggested words (spell-craft) and letters (symbolism), while ignoring perceivable sound and symmetry, keeps one within a conflict of reason "against letters".