muh green energy...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
You remind me of horse owners in the early 1900s yelling at the clouds because of “the stinking automobile”.
You need to keep up with the superior technology, old man.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 dipshit; you're just pathetic
Because I know way more about BEVs than you?
Or because I’m not buying into the mantra that BEVs are the devils tool?
The way I see it, there’s nothing about EVs that goes against what W is saying or “the plan”.
Quite the opposite, as EVs seems to have financed a big part of the plan: getting Twitter on private hands.
I don’t care if you hate EVs, but at least hate them for the right reasons. Changing batteries after 5 years is not one of those reasons.
Another thing.
One of our main tasks as anons in the coming “great awakening”, is to support our peers in their transition away from the old guard.
You’ll meet countless people that doesn’t align with your views 100%, but are still on your side against the DS/NWO/WEF and the great reset.
You’ll be actively working against what Q told us if you continue to call people that doesn’t completely agree with you for “dipshit”, “pathetic” or other profanities.
The amount of hate against people with a slightly different take (especially regarding EVs) on this site is staggering.
Especially after what Q told us about what our task will be during the storm.
Take a step back patriot, and reconcile.
Ah, so you back away from the ad hominem attack. Now, I am a patriot where, before, I was an old man. I am using profanity? You ARE pathetic.
Old man is a humorous way of describing people not open to new tech.
“Pathetic” and “dipshit” however will only hurt our “movement”.
I never intended to “hurt your feelings” in any way.
You on the other hand is resorting to disrespect as soon as anybody is having a different opinion.
We’ll never agree on EVs, but can we at least agree to stop using insults when supporting our peers during the storm, even though they’re not 100% agreeing with our views?