Stating the obvious but this bears repeating over and over
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
No offense, but your statement shows that you do not understand modern women (at least in the west).
In general, all women are hypergamous.
Every women in the west have a tool in their pocket (the smart phone) where if they feel they can upgrade, they will.
Modern western women interpret attention and sex as if those attributes make a relationship. They have access to higher caliber men they would have never had access to in the past.
Further, most modern western women are at a plus 10 partner count before they decide to get married. Almost every study done on this shows that women with more than 3 partners are basically unmarriable -- especially when divorce laws almost make it so the girl has incentives to divorce.
Religion (in the west) slows this down a bit, but does not stop it. More than 3 partner count increases the odds of a marriage not working and even most religious girls are at that level.
So it has nothing to do with "respect for women".
I think this is really the first generation too in which men understand women much better than women understanding men. Women have largely checked out and stopped trying to understand men because why would they when they can just swipe next at the first sign of inconvenience
Most women don’t respect themselves, so they jump into bed with any Tom, Dick or Harry. They use the mantra of society as gospel: “My body, my choice”, but only when it justifies their actions. What about the man who has had more than 3 partners? Is he marriage material? Is he considered more marriageable due to his “experience?” I believe women going into the work force was the worst thing for the family: the mother isn’t there for the children (they are in nursery school/daycare or after school care) and men depend on the woman to bring in money so they are lazy. There are two sides to every coin. Maybe the wife is higher paid and the husband is a good Dad AND homemaker. If the wife works then the husband should care for the house (cook, clean, yard work, take children to soccer). It is good for the wife to have work experience, so she can support the family if needed: death of a spouse, job loss of a spouse, divorce. Men have been put at a disadvantage by the courts: spousal and child support. If there was no spousal support and only 50% child support, it might make couples think twice about marriage and about divorce.
Yes
Long story short: Women want the same man. His experience is an asset.
Men do not want "experienced" women. Each partner a woman has sex with lowers her amount of Oxytocin released making it harder for her to pair bond. Further, women are chimeric. So each dude that ejaculates inside her, there is a chance that she keeps that DNA aka male microchimerism
Another Study
Finally, high amounts of promiscuity has been found in women with mental issues, women borne to single mothers, and women molested as children. Therefore high partner count in a woman is also a symptom of major issues as well as a red flag for previous behavior i.e. don't marry them.
This is why we slut shame women, but shame men for being incels, neckbeards, and virgins.
##Further, 80% of all divorces are initiated by women, not men.
I agree
I have only ever seen this in low IQ societies like the Philippines or a few African countries. Since God does not play around with the X chromosome, Women stay within 1 to 2 Standard Deviation of 90 to 100 IQ, while men can go well above or well below this number.
This never works long term. When women are the bread winner, the rate of divorce also goes up. Women want to be taken care of, not the other way around. Since Hypergamy.
You would then be Japan. Almost no alimony, but there is no child support. However, women 100% get custody by law.