Examples:
- Celebrity accounts
- NPR
They all quit over petty disputes with Elon Musk's policies.
But any mature, sensible, or business savvy person would find a way, and work within their constraints.
Why did they fold so easily?
My theories:
- They are all run by inexperienced people who can't handle the smallest bit of challenges in the workplace. Maybe managing a Twitter account is their first job.
- They are all heavily influenced by FBI, and CIA. They are encouraged to just quit.
- They are all managed by the same firm who lacks the man-power to play a chess game with Elon. (Any kind of work that's as complex as chess is too much brain power for them).
- Twitter or a white hat proposed a plea bargain that requires quitting Twitter.
Here's a possibility: Assume Elon is not who he purports to be, making assumptions by his actions up until this point not by his words or media coverage Elon got his wealth pushing climate change and getting government money, Elon has blanketed the world in satellites making it impossible to escape the grid, Elon is working on brain chips, Elon does everything our enemies want to do but everyone pretends "oh it's just Elon being Elon" although you'd expect geopolitical adversaries to have some questions about allowing a US citizen to blanket the Earth in satellites with Starlink. So let's say Elon is an intelligence asset. Right leaning people are primed for a backlash. Opening Twitter up (though not completely) allows there to be a pressure release valve while continuing to further the divide between people. No one will change each others mind but outrage will build higher (this is what I've seen). Even giving intelligence a better look at what it would look like when these ideologies meet. More data for the AI. All while giving them a new shepherd who most conservatives now love, "based Elon". These organizations are playing their part intentionally or not by feeding into the hero Elon narrative
This is a highly-intelligent analysis. Thank you, sir!