It's a very slippery slope, pede. Islam is not a religion, it's a political system foremost, and spreads like a virus in its host nations.
Exactly, and I see this every day here in Germany. The more they reproduce the more they impose their islamic way of life (including Shariah) on others and forcefully demand it.
It's not that I'm calling for it, but realistically speaking, if one wants to prevent Germany (and Sweden and some other countries in the west) from becoming predominantly muslim in 20-30 years, there would be no way around mass deportations or genocide. There simply is no other way and I'm thinking about moving to another country with my young family.
This is a highly-intelligent analysis. Thank you, sir!
The real origin of the name "Budweiser" is that this beer originally comes from Budweis, Czech Republic (Bohemia). The suffix "-er" in German means "of ... origin" and can be applied to both people and things. Analogously, "Pilsener" means "of Pilsen origin", where Pilsen is also a Czech city. An example for a German beer is "Krombacher".
Your prescribed meaning above can at most be called a backronym.
The yield curve has inverted, which you can see here (https://stockcharts.com/freecharts/yieldcurve.php). This is interesting insofar as this means that short-term bonds are yielding more than long-term bonds, which makes zero sense. An inverted yield curve is always a massive red flag for a banking collapse.
UP IS DOWN.
I am currently taking a relatively high dose (~2g/day) as part of the CDF-protocol and have zero side-effects of the NAC itself. My father, though, gets skin rashes from it, however, these may also stem from mass die-offs as a result of a reaction between NAC and a pathogen.
The safest bet thus is to first try it out in low doses and see how she reacts to it. NAC has been found to be safe even in very high doses (12g/day), so either there is no reaction or a pretty severe one.
Keep in mind that NAC blocks the absorption of Vitamin C and Zinc, so you should supplement both to counteract.
If we go with the official narrative and also assume that the tetanus vaccine is safe and effective, there still is the strong point of modern wound care. Tetanus is an anaerobic (growing in oxygen-deprived environments) bacterium. This implies that for a wound to get infected it needs to be deep and non-bleeding, because blood brings oxygen. Hydrogen peroxide also brings oxygen.
If you have a deep cut and a doctor/professional takes care of it or you simply clean and treat it properly with hydrogen peroxide, I see zero chance that tetanus could be any problem for you and zero need for a 'vaccine'.
Among all the vaccinations in Germany (which is where I live), I find the tetanus vaccine to be the easiest to debunk for said reason. Thus I'm always a bit surprised, as the anti-vaccine-people here, including medical professionals, usually tend to be pretty open towards it.
tl;dr: Proper wound care alone makes the tetanus vaccine superfluous.
What the other replies said, but also: Keep in mind the average age of these very few tetanus deaths, which is >80 and usually due to weakened immune systems. The parallels to COVID-19-fear-mongering are obvious.
They are not even hiding it. A paper by the UN on "Replacement Migration".
Good point! Thanks for your input and have a merry christmas!
To give a translation: This chart shows deaths per quarter from 2016 to 2022 limited to certain causes of death: Sudden heart failure (I46.1), non-further-specified heart failure (I46.9), sudden death (R96.0), death within 24 hours after symptom onset without further specification (R96.1), death without other people present (R98), other unclear or non-further-specified causes of death (R99).
If anybody claims this was due to Corona: Point out that the data clearly shows no uptick for Q2, Q3 and Q4 2020, even though this was claimed to be the worst timeframe in regard to SARS-CoV-2.
I can give a brief summary of the situation in Germany (and elaborate further, if you want): There is a high level of sickness among the workforce. Most of my colleagues, all vaccinated and boostered, suffer from constant sickness. The older colleagues are clearly confused and heavy-headed. I work in a large company and due to the high number of people being out sick, it has huge effects on certain things like holiday applications and spending reviews. A huge part of people work from home, which is often the case given they're constantly sick.
As food for thought: Was the focus on home office work deliberate to dampen the economic effects of people being constantly sick a bit?
"Not all Muslims..."