I'm shutting down libs' J6 arguments on Twitter by challenging them to explain their "insurrection" conspiracy theory. They truly don't know how.
(media.greatawakening.win)
FIFTH GEN WARFARE
Challenging them to explain this should always be our approach, because J6 really was just a product of Blue Anon.
After pointing out how ridiculous it is that an unarmed flashmob would overthrow the most powerful nation in history, one response I received was "Being bad at it doesn't excuse an attempt to stop the peaceful transfer of power, [formerly] a cornerstone of American democracy."
My response: Oh so now "It's not that it wasn't an insurrection, they were just bad at it." But didn't y'all go on & on for months about how fragile our Democracy is? Isn't J6 a dark day when "We almost lost our country"? And now it's, "Meh, they were just bad at it." Get your story straight.
I also don't accept their argument that 13 people had guns, but I went along with it to prove the theory is still absurd.
First I've ever heard this claim, I only know of one guy getting caught with a gun at J6 and he turned out to be a Fed.
Fake news articles saying secret service claimed they saw people with guns. I told them "Ok, 1000's of phone cameras but no video of guns or threats of using guns despite police beating & gassing people." They insisted the claims mattered, so I went with it because attacking their insurrection argument mattered more.
Yeah, you have to pick your battles when debating NPCs. When they smell you getting close to a point they don't want made, they'll try and make the debate about something else.
OMG is this the truth. They were shameless in latching onto insignificant points just to drag the convo into the weeds. They were desperate to avoid the main point about J6 being a dead end theory.