Let's play a game. Keep in mind this article states it was sourced by a brief questionnaire on a reddit sub forum.
FTA:
"But some Washington residents told VICE News that they’re worried the ban creates a situation where “traditional” gun owners—white, male conservatives—are sitting on an arsenal of high-powered weapons, which emerging demographics of gun owners, like LGBTQ people, leftists and minorities, no longer have access to. "
Aside from the obvious question which is "who are these 'some Washington residents?'" do you spot any subtle "calls to action" to their readership?
Feel free to find more in the article. This is one of the (I assume) many minor fronts "The Left" is using to get the notion of "violent LGBTQ shooters" into the zeitgeist.
Vice magazine is in trouble. Would not trust much from them. They are desperate and looking for click bait
https://nypost.com/2022/05/03/vice-media-hires-financial-advisor-for-sale-report/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=pasteboard_app
Let's play a game. Keep in mind this article states it was sourced by a brief questionnaire on a reddit sub forum.
FTA:
"But some Washington residents told VICE News that they’re worried the ban creates a situation where “traditional” gun owners—white, male conservatives—are sitting on an arsenal of high-powered weapons, which emerging demographics of gun owners, like LGBTQ people, leftists and minorities, no longer have access to. "
Aside from the obvious question which is "who are these 'some Washington residents?'" do you spot any subtle "calls to action" to their readership?
Feel free to find more in the article. This is one of the (I assume) many minor fronts "The Left" is using to get the notion of "violent LGBTQ shooters" into the zeitgeist.
Comms. Triggers. Etc.
Hello to any VICE "journalists" browsing. 👋