I'm not sure how to show you other than a link to his Facebook. It's the first post. https://m.facebook.com/raland.brunson
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (8)
sorted by:
Ok, so now we have Supremes going to court, how does this work if it hits SCOTUS???
Surely they cannot be allowed to sit on the Supreme Court and hear this case at the same time....
So Precedent will have to be established for things exactly such as this, should it ever happen again....
But what if Congress, or the Senate tries to replace them with other even more libtarded Justices???
I'm going to predict that Congress will try to pull another fast one like they did in Ex Parte McCardle....
This is the Case:::
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/74/506
But, when reading it, you must give special Attention to This part::
"" 6
'It is clear, that when the jurisdiction of a cause depends upon the statute, the repeal of the statute takes away the jurisdiction.' 8
And in that case the repealing statute, which was passed during the pendency of the cause, was held to deprive the court of all further jurisdiction. The causes which were pending in this court against States, were all dismissed by the amendment of the Constitution denying the jurisdiction; and no further proceedings were had in those causes.9 In Norris v. Crocker,10 this court affirmed and acted upon the same principle; and the exhaustive argument of the present Chief Justice, then at the bar, reported in that case, and the numerous authorities there cited, render any further argument or citation of cases unnecessary.11 ""
The Power of Congress over SCOTUS is what allowed Congress to play games with many Good Solid Cases that might have set much good Precedents for Laws in our Judicial System, but they totally screwed us over, and that was the First time that I know of....