Conservative Treehouse article on Tucker Carlson firing. Very interesting info here. - The Great Awakening

Conservative Treehouse article on Tucker Carlson firing. Very interesting info here. (theconservativetreehouse.com)

posted 1 year ago by Sunnywindows 1 year ago by Sunnywindows +195 / -0

Thoughts on Tucker Carlson's Firing - The Last Refuge

This is a context you won’t find elsewhere {smiles}. The phone has been blowing up…. Context and some details matter. First, Carlson was being paid about $20 million a year by Murdoch. He had about 3 years left on his contract and will be paid the full c...

32 comments

32 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (32)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– huntfishpede 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

But how can the judge do that when Dominion did not have to prove anything?? If anything, this summary judgement basically says Fox exercised free speech and then they stop short of determining whether that speech was purposefully harmful which should have been the only thing on trial. Fox did nothing wrong in terms of this case and it is just criminal money laundering/transferring at the end of the day. Anyone with eyes can see it.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– TomPaineSentMe 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

But how can the judge do that when Dominion did not have to prove anything?

But they did have to prove things. This lawsuit has been going on for two years. Dominion got access to the Fox emails and texts in discovery, they deposed witnesses. They turned over their source code to Fox. Page 43 the judge says

While the Court must view the record in the light most favorable to Fox, the record does not show a genuine issue of material fact as to falsity. Through its extensive proof, Dominion has met its burden of showing there is no genuine issue of material fact as to falsity. Fox therefore had the burden to show an issue of material fact existed in turn. Fox failed to meet its burden. The evidence developed in this civil proceeding demonstrates that is CRYSTAL clear ...

...

this summary judgement basically says Fox exercised free speech

Defamation is not free speech and doesn't enjoy the protections of the First Amendment which is why you can sue someone for libel or slander.

Fox did nothing wrong in terms of this case

I would look at pages 38-43 of the summary judgement. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23736885-dominion-v-fox-summary-judgment

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q