What I said sounds dumb but the idea that a person can suffer a traumatic dog attack, followed by a boogeyman-virus swimming into their brain and going "dormant", only to re-emerge and "attack" his body 30-years later sending him into fits of rage and memories of his attack...sounds perfectly sane.
What is so insane about the concept of a virus laying dormant in a body? It's either correct or incorrect. For you to ridicule people who don't subscribe to your belief is obnoxious.
You started the ridicule, I just returned the favor. Like for like.
Step one is proving that ANY BOOGEYMAN-VIRUS exists. This has never been accomplished because they're made-up nothing-burgers.
Because of this failure, the establishment deceivers need to make up all sorts of ludicrous tales like "dormancy", "asymptomatic carriers", can only spread through saliva, etc. It's nothing but one lie stacked on top of another lie, ad infinitum.
The fact that nobody has ever been able to find a boogeyman-virus in the fluids or tissues of a living organism is the beginning and ending of any debate on the subject. They readily admit they've never been able to achieve this, for yet another laundry list of ludicrous reasons - "there's not enough there" or "they're too hard to find because they're hiding". It's all absurdity.
Open your mind and consider the possibility that you've been deceived to cause you fear. This is the whole game. The lies of germ theory are just one aspect of the larger agenda. Fear and judgment are the great destroyers of mankind.
Your thread title calls people who accept that viruses are real "pseudo-truthers," dumbass. I am going to go out on a limb and say the majority of posters here don't outright reject the idea of viruses, let alone bacterial infections.
Sorry, that sounds dumb as shit.
What I said sounds dumb but the idea that a person can suffer a traumatic dog attack, followed by a boogeyman-virus swimming into their brain and going "dormant", only to re-emerge and "attack" his body 30-years later sending him into fits of rage and memories of his attack...sounds perfectly sane.
Got it!
What is so insane about the concept of a virus laying dormant in a body? It's either correct or incorrect. For you to ridicule people who don't subscribe to your belief is obnoxious.
You started the ridicule, I just returned the favor. Like for like.
Step one is proving that ANY BOOGEYMAN-VIRUS exists. This has never been accomplished because they're made-up nothing-burgers.
Because of this failure, the establishment deceivers need to make up all sorts of ludicrous tales like "dormancy", "asymptomatic carriers", can only spread through saliva, etc. It's nothing but one lie stacked on top of another lie, ad infinitum.
The fact that nobody has ever been able to find a boogeyman-virus in the fluids or tissues of a living organism is the beginning and ending of any debate on the subject. They readily admit they've never been able to achieve this, for yet another laundry list of ludicrous reasons - "there's not enough there" or "they're too hard to find because they're hiding". It's all absurdity.
Open your mind and consider the possibility that you've been deceived to cause you fear. This is the whole game. The lies of germ theory are just one aspect of the larger agenda. Fear and judgment are the great destroyers of mankind.
Your thread title calls people who accept that viruses are real "pseudo-truthers," dumbass. I am going to go out on a limb and say the majority of posters here don't outright reject the idea of viruses, let alone bacterial infections.