Was it a mistake to call it Election FRAUD?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Yes, we all know that it was, but look at what happened in Arizona. They proved that the printer settings were changed the night before the election to make sure votes in heavily Republican areas couldn't be counted, but by calling it FRAUD we have to prove it was intentional. Is that part of the reason we're having such a hard time making our case to these judges? Should the argument be shifted from "they did it on purpose" to "it doesn't matter whether it does done intentionally or not, it was done, and voters were disenfranchised. We need to do it over again." Or something to that extent?
I think the burden of proof of fraud is much higher as intent must be proved versus simple disenfranchisement being the result irrespective of intent. Conservatives suck at this because we focus on only the issue not the desired result. You win the war by winning little battles along the way by knowing the rules and how to play. I agree with tobeself ^^^