Was it a mistake to call it Election FRAUD?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Yes, we all know that it was, but look at what happened in Arizona. They proved that the printer settings were changed the night before the election to make sure votes in heavily Republican areas couldn't be counted, but by calling it FRAUD we have to prove it was intentional. Is that part of the reason we're having such a hard time making our case to these judges? Should the argument be shifted from "they did it on purpose" to "it doesn't matter whether it does done intentionally or not, it was done, and voters were disenfranchised. We need to do it over again." Or something to that extent?
I've always thought "fraud" was a tactical error for that reason, have to prove intent and conspiracy and who knows what more. The point is to undo the election, if it can be done by some other means, fine. So it gives the fraudsters a somewhat face-saving out. What was gained by insisting on a particular crime? Nothing, only prolonged fighting.