With the WaPo, a known outlet of the Mockingbird CIA media, you always have to ask yourself, "Why this topic?...Why this point of view? ...and Why now" What we are seeing here is not necessarily the "news" but rather what the Derp State WANTS us to think. So why?
I can discern several misdirections in that brief excerpt above, such as "would rather not have to deal with the possibility that Ukraine or allies were involved." Really? Suggesting that Ukraine was involved (unlikely due to technical challenges) puts suspicion away from the true culprit.
"The attack happened months ago...." Suggesting that it's old news, can't we just move on?
And so on. Never trust the WaPo to get it right, it's ALWAYS misdirection and part of a psy-op against us.
With the WaPo, a known outlet of the Mockingbird CIA media, you always have to ask yourself, "Why this topic?...Why this point of view? ...and Why now" What we are seeing here is not necessarily the "news" but rather what the Derp State WANTS us to think. So why?
I can discern several misdirections in that brief excerpt above, such as "would rather not have to deal with the possibility that Ukraine or allies were involved." Really? Suggesting that Ukraine was involved (unlikely due to technical challenges) puts suspicion away from the true culprit.
"The attack happened months ago...." Suggesting that it's old news, can't we just move on?
And so on. Never trust the WaPo to get it right, it's ALWAYS misdirection and part of a psy-op against us.