Watch the show and come back. Jim Price is vomit incarnate the entire time lol. It wasn't just his eating although it wasn't a good look. He ruined what would've been great info for Q newbies.
no. autism means you process a lot of information without being socially acceptable. the accuracy of information depends only on the accuracy of information ; not upon the eating habits of those delivering it. not all of our high level autists are socially acceptable
It wasn't just the first few minutes, it continues on while Josh is having a great conversation. I am not discrediting Jim either, just saying it was rude and damn disrespectful to Josh. I don't know where you got I said it discredits Jim. The other person said that not me.
I didn't make any excuses. I said the accuracy of information depends only on the accuracy of information, which is true. just trying to stay accurate. do you think you've provided an example of good manners here?
eating for a few minutes at the beginning of a long after-hours podcast is hardly grounds to discredit someone
Watch the show and come back. Jim Price is vomit incarnate the entire time lol. It wasn't just his eating although it wasn't a good look. He ruined what would've been great info for Q newbies.
Jim Price engages in moments of snarky dismissiveness and borderline stupidity, is he drunk?
He’s just annoying! He interrupted Josh probably 50 times. And not with anything pertinent. Just babbling.
Yes, it is grounds to discredit.
no. autism means you process a lot of information without being socially acceptable. the accuracy of information depends only on the accuracy of information ; not upon the eating habits of those delivering it. not all of our high level autists are socially acceptable
It wasn't just the first few minutes, it continues on while Josh is having a great conversation. I am not discrediting Jim either, just saying it was rude and damn disrespectful to Josh. I don't know where you got I said it discredits Jim. The other person said that not me.
Manners matter. Trying to make excuses for the lack of them leads me to believe you could be lacking them yourself. That sound about right Dr. Freud?
I didn't make any excuses. I said the accuracy of information depends only on the accuracy of information, which is true. just trying to stay accurate. do you think you've provided an example of good manners here?