Video 4 minutes. Covid-19 vaccine package information sheet was BLANK. Is this a proof that there was NO informed consent?
(rumble.com)
🚔 Crime & Medical Tyranny 💸
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Sort of, but that’s not an informed consent document. It’s a package insert which is only available for approved drugs. Vax was never approved (the one that was was unavailable) so this fancy, little-font piece of paper looks exactly like it should, empty. In this case they need to present an Investigators Brochure (a much larger document) and the doctor is on the hook for explaining the risks and side effects to the research subject. Then obtaining your voluntary consent on a separate form. In writing. How many vax recipients did that?
I agree
Before the vaccines were distributed. I searched and could not find any ingredient anywhere. I always read the ingredients of anything I put into my body.
During the first month the vaccines were distributed, when asked if I would get vaxx I answered "I first need to read the ingredient. After that, I might get the vaxx. Do you know where I can get the ingredient?" No answer. The only answer that I could find was from a from awake doctors. Who said that it was not a traditional vaccine. Because it was an EXPERIMENTAL mRNA without the usual full 10 years safety tests.
Still during the first month, after other people came back from getting the vaxx I asked them if they were given the ingredient and asked to sign a consent form for the mRNA experiment? Everybody answered no. That no answer was smelling and looking very suspicious. Most of those people felt very sick shortly after getting those vaxx.
I did not trust the vaxx before, during, and after they were offered. No ingredient = No trust.
Pretty curious how every state came down on people for producing fake vax-passes, but the vax company can just bluff their way with their own little faked counterfeit contrivance that lets them pretend this is legit, tested, regulated and fully ingredient and side-affect disclosed medication.
Great great point!
Very curious.
Even more curious how people can still be so subservient that they don't question this.
However, informed consent still applies under EUA, and PIs are required in ALL meds-- there was a video a couple yrs back where a person video taped a pharmacist opening a clot shot PI-- She was mortified to see it blank and was sure it was a random error-- nope, the whole lot, blank PIs
Completely agree. Every single recipient of the clot shot should’ve sign consent. The pharmacist who was “mortified” by th blank Insert should not have been surprised at all. It’s similar to Baldwin shooting that lady. He knew he was holding a gun, guns shoot bullets, “I was told there are no bullets in this one” , and he pulled the trigger anyway