A wide variety of sourcs, including many many original sources like the one you just provided.
a lot of things in life sound like BS until you look deeply into them. that's why we're all here. none of us are finished having our beliefs challenged. you don't have to pay attention to symbolism, but there are people who do on both sides of this larger conflict.
But some of those things actually are BS, not just sound like it. I have been reading things like this for over 50 years. I have a ton of books, so I know a lot.
Let's see now. First the "signs of the zodiac" don't match where the stars actually are now. Second, the stars are too far away to affect anything at all here on earth. Third, I've never seen an accurate horoscope for myself or even a small series of accurate horoscopes for anyone else.
BTW, proving a negative theoretically is very difficult, so how about you prove astrology?
Astrology just happens to be utter BS.
Tsarion can have a ton of sources, but that doesn't say a word about the quality of the sources. They might all be wingnuts as well.
A wide variety of sourcs, including many many original sources like the one you just provided.
a lot of things in life sound like BS until you look deeply into them. that's why we're all here. none of us are finished having our beliefs challenged. you don't have to pay attention to symbolism, but there are people who do on both sides of this larger conflict.
But some of those things actually are BS, not just sound like it. I have been reading things like this for over 50 years. I have a ton of books, so I know a lot.
okay... go ahead and disprove astrology or whatever
Let's see now. First the "signs of the zodiac" don't match where the stars actually are now. Second, the stars are too far away to affect anything at all here on earth. Third, I've never seen an accurate horoscope for myself or even a small series of accurate horoscopes for anyone else.
BTW, proving a negative theoretically is very difficult, so how about you prove astrology?