I've long said the “National Historic Preservation Act” or better known as the Indian Preservation Act was designed to hide our history. The Smithsonian Institution is the most corrupt historical society there is. For over 100 years, the Smithsonian Institution has been hiding and destroying evidence that would provide proof that the writings in the Old Testament and the Book Of Enoch are true. So, successful have they been using the “National Historic Preservation Act”, any artifact or remains that show the Amer-Ind were not the first people in North or South America, is quickly claimed as an "ancestral Native American". A lawsuit ensues and all analysis is halted. An example of this is the Kennewick Man, a 9,000 year old skeleton, whose skull measurements showed it didn't match existing Native American populations. Kennewick Man became the subject of a controversial nine-year court case between scientists and Native American tribes who claimed ownership of the remains. In 2016, the US House and Senate passed legislation to return the ancient bones to a coalition of Columbia Basin tribes for reburial according to their traditions, to which no further study of it's DNA can be made to determine its haplogroup significance. It was said the origin related to the Ainus (descendants of the Jōmon aboriginals of Japan). The Kennewick man is now lost. To make things worse, some argue further that the phrase "Native American" should be applied so that it spans the entire range from the Clovis culture (which cannot be positively assigned to any contemporary tribal group) to the Métis, a group of mixed ancestry who developed as an ethnic group as a consequence of European contact, yet constitute distinct cultural entity.
There is the same attempt being made here in the United States and other western countries to use native American rights to strip us of our property rights.
Thanks for those details fren. 100% agree. I too am of the very strong opinion that the indigenous Australians were at least sharing the land at some stage in the past with another race. That other race were probably quite tall... I’m well aware of all the skeletons the Smithsonian has hidden away....
It makes sense to me. There's the Tri-hybrid racial theory that seems to explain it. Every history is more complicated than what we are force fed.
We know the Tasmanian aborigines did not share the same technology as the the Australian aborigines. They never knew the art of boomerang, bone tools, fishing, barbed points, and ground axe heads were not found among the Tasmanians. They didn't even bury their dead.
By the time that Europeans were able to observe them, their entire material culture consisted of about 24 items: "wooden spears, throwing clubs, the women's club-chisel-digging stick, wooden wedges or spatulae, baskets woven from grass or rushes, possum-skin pouch bags, water buckets made from kelp, fire-sticks, kangaroo skin cloaks, shell necklaces, canoe-rafts, huts and a few stone tools."
Then there is the extinct Australian Negritos (pygmies),; (ala, Lake Mungo Man). There's evidence of these phenotype expressions of Tasmanian aborigines that are different from the mainland people, but most of it appears to be from Melanesian stock (Murrayians). Then, there are the “Australian canoes, which are constructed identically to those of the coastal Dravidian tribes of India, and wild tribes in the Deccan region of India are the only culture known to use the boomerang outside Australia.”
Lastly, there's evidence that the Egyptians made it Australia too.
To add to that: a Viking settlement was discovered in Western Australia a few years ago. Wish I'd archived it as it seems to have been scrubbed from the net. The articles at the time described the settlement as containing many artifacts including swords, axes and much more. A forge was also found.
Regarding the Egyptians: Yes! I've personally explored the hieroglyphs discovered in the Gosford region of NSW. The mainstream science official narrative of them is ridiculous. Having witnessed them with my own eyes I am 100% certain that they are very old and genuine.
These things are but a tiny sliver of the hidden history of Australia. And the world. The capital cities and the old "settlement" towns reveal so much more underground. Dare I mention Tartaria...
I've long said the “National Historic Preservation Act” or better known as the Indian Preservation Act was designed to hide our history. The Smithsonian Institution is the most corrupt historical society there is. For over 100 years, the Smithsonian Institution has been hiding and destroying evidence that would provide proof that the writings in the Old Testament and the Book Of Enoch are true. So, successful have they been using the “National Historic Preservation Act”, any artifact or remains that show the Amer-Ind were not the first people in North or South America, is quickly claimed as an "ancestral Native American". A lawsuit ensues and all analysis is halted. An example of this is the Kennewick Man, a 9,000 year old skeleton, whose skull measurements showed it didn't match existing Native American populations. Kennewick Man became the subject of a controversial nine-year court case between scientists and Native American tribes who claimed ownership of the remains. In 2016, the US House and Senate passed legislation to return the ancient bones to a coalition of Columbia Basin tribes for reburial according to their traditions, to which no further study of it's DNA can be made to determine its haplogroup significance. It was said the origin related to the Ainus (descendants of the Jōmon aboriginals of Japan). The Kennewick man is now lost. To make things worse, some argue further that the phrase "Native American" should be applied so that it spans the entire range from the Clovis culture (which cannot be positively assigned to any contemporary tribal group) to the Métis, a group of mixed ancestry who developed as an ethnic group as a consequence of European contact, yet constitute distinct cultural entity.
There is the same attempt being made here in the United States and other western countries to use native American rights to strip us of our property rights.
Read up on the Solutreans (https://www.ancientpages.com/2018/02/23/solutrean-people-first-americans-european-stone-age-people/). Apparently the first people in the Americas were Europeans. Hmmm, don't hear much about that, do you?
Thanks for those details fren. 100% agree. I too am of the very strong opinion that the indigenous Australians were at least sharing the land at some stage in the past with another race. That other race were probably quite tall... I’m well aware of all the skeletons the Smithsonian has hidden away....
It makes sense to me. There's the Tri-hybrid racial theory that seems to explain it. Every history is more complicated than what we are force fed.
We know the Tasmanian aborigines did not share the same technology as the the Australian aborigines. They never knew the art of boomerang, bone tools, fishing, barbed points, and ground axe heads were not found among the Tasmanians. They didn't even bury their dead.
By the time that Europeans were able to observe them, their entire material culture consisted of about 24 items: "wooden spears, throwing clubs, the women's club-chisel-digging stick, wooden wedges or spatulae, baskets woven from grass or rushes, possum-skin pouch bags, water buckets made from kelp, fire-sticks, kangaroo skin cloaks, shell necklaces, canoe-rafts, huts and a few stone tools."
Then there is the extinct Australian Negritos (pygmies),; (ala, Lake Mungo Man). There's evidence of these phenotype expressions of Tasmanian aborigines that are different from the mainland people, but most of it appears to be from Melanesian stock (Murrayians). Then, there are the “Australian canoes, which are constructed identically to those of the coastal Dravidian tribes of India, and wild tribes in the Deccan region of India are the only culture known to use the boomerang outside Australia.”
Lastly, there's evidence that the Egyptians made it Australia too.
More great info! Thank you!
To add to that: a Viking settlement was discovered in Western Australia a few years ago. Wish I'd archived it as it seems to have been scrubbed from the net. The articles at the time described the settlement as containing many artifacts including swords, axes and much more. A forge was also found.
Regarding the Egyptians: Yes! I've personally explored the hieroglyphs discovered in the Gosford region of NSW. The mainstream science official narrative of them is ridiculous. Having witnessed them with my own eyes I am 100% certain that they are very old and genuine.
These things are but a tiny sliver of the hidden history of Australia. And the world. The capital cities and the old "settlement" towns reveal so much more underground. Dare I mention Tartaria...
Viking settlement? I'd enjoy reading about this. Have you tried doing an archive search?