Tuckers first Twitter Monologue draws more that all of MSM Combined…Hey Joe.. How many votes did You Get ??? More EVIDENCE on Steroids !!😏🤡🌎
(media.greatawakening.win)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
40,000 ft. view
Tucker's page shows 23.4M views on the video and 79.1M views on the Tweet.
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1651376097349578753
The view doesn't count unless the entire video is watched IIRC.
So they are comparing the amount of times the tweet was viewed with actual video Cable viewership. So this whole post is just an exaggeration. Tweet views don't have the same impact as watching videos.
23.4M views is pretty impressive in and of itself.
We’ll TV views don’t actually count who’s watching the content, so how is it different? If anything this is more valuable that TV views because it was people actively choosing to click on a link to see the content.
Can nobody just be accurate and stop coercion and sales techniques!? It's so slimy.
It's still accurate, even if not entirely and it's an important keystone.
More people saw Tucker's post, even without the video, than the propagandists.
It's incredibly important, because it emphasizes the reach he can have. That's worth millions of dollars to marketing on its own.
If you only include the video, he still smashed almost half of the networks combined.
This cannot be understated.
Tracked down Chief Nerd's Tweet as well, and it was tagged with Community Notes-
"While the tweet containing Carlson’s monologue had 74.9m views, the actual video of the monologue had only 22.1m views meaning over 52m people who saw the tweet did not watch the monologue."
https://twitter.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1652002473010245645
Twitter used to count a view of 3 seconds or longer as a view, but I believe that's changed. Somebody would have to verify that.
I do know for paid accounts, you can see if 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of the video was watched now in Twitter analytics. It's likely all 4 of those metrics count as a view.
Is that true? I had no idea the partial views don't count.