Yes this means you…..
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
The deal is that the trannies attacking women is designed to cause chaos and disillusion. Ideally it will spark a war between the sexes, like the women's rights movement did earlier last century. Women now arguably have more rights than men - for example, they have more college degrees, the only thing that can be argued is equal pay in a lifetime, but that is because women DO have to take time out for child bearing.
The leftie cult/ideology/religion delights at causing chaos and even wide-spread death, as we have witnessed in the last three years re: Covid measures. Those satanic individuals are salivating at the idea of a tranny actually killing a woman.
There are women protesting this thing, and amazingly, the media is blasting them as transphobic. Same playbook.
Oh, and the answer is: get a proper boyfriend and/or husband. Traditionally, they ARE the knights in shining armor. This is the way it was designed to be, as women are vulnerable when they are heavily pregnant and carrying a babe in arms. The instinct to protect mothers carries on for a lifetime when the pair is bonded. It is not sexist, it just is.
Also, feminism can be tempered to recognize male/female bonding too. For example, a strong woman can emotionally support a man's efforts to get a better job through education, even if she is looking after toddlers. This is topical today, as many men give up on education and/or vocational training prematurely, because the system is absurdly geared towards women.
Relationships are not just about sex, as the radicals, and Hollywood, tried to make out.
Yep to any ungrateful woman who says "chivalry is dead" just for not holding a door for her point out that 1) Chivalry is mostly a code of combat and 2) the parts pertaining to women carried the price of the woman being obedient to her man.
It's hard to hold doors for women - one has to judge beforehand if the participant will get offended by it - usually the ones wearing normal make-up, or none at all, with natural colored hair, appreciate it. But the spiteful mutants, with noserings will start yelling at one.
The feminists took particular exception to the obedience part. They painted it as women are expected to be barefoot and pregnant, in the kitchen.
It is my hypothesis that the language has changed. I believe that a woman has to manage the man in a relationship. This includes giving them enough responsibility to gain respect for themselves. The traditional Obedience is not a slavery situation, in my opinion. It is more like unconditional love and support - which women happen to be very good at.