Meanwhile in York, UK…
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
Hey I know we don't like Charles, but still least there's a distinctive as to why this is more retarded than not my president. HE IS THE KING of the country, no dispute. So not my king poster is just retarded because the peasants don't get a say in that choice.
Us plebs get to have a say 'cos the Queen sold us down the river. You can say it was her advisors, corrupt Pilgrim society, but it happened on her watch. She signed away our sovereignty for dirty European cash.
Hey fine by me if you're ready to storm Windsor palace. My point being is that he is the legitimate King. The line of succession have been reaffirmed for like 70 years at this point. Unlike biden who was s'elected' in the middle of the night with very questionable ballot drops at 2am after the polls closed. You guys at least have a legit gripe against a legit figure head, unlike us here who had our legit figure head ripped from us through fraudulent means.
Au Contraire, mine theWOknessHurts. The Plantagenet Heir to the British throne Simon Abney-Hastings, the 15th Earl of Loudon is a landowner who lives in Australia, has been invited to the coronation, and will be participating in an official capacity as part of the ceremony. He is one of 13 people to do so (take THAT Royal Dukes) He will be keeping (presenting etc.) the Golden Spurs of office.
FYI Golden Spurs are part of the crown jewels. Gold spurs were first included among the English coronation ornaments in 1189, at the coronation of Richard I (the Lionheart). They symbolized knighthood, and their use in the coronation ritual derives directly from the ceremony of creating a knight. These spurs were made in 1661 for Charles II but were altered in 1820 for George IV, when new textiles replaced the earlier buckles and straps.
The spurs form part of the coronation ceremony in which the sovereign is invested with the ornaments or symbols of royalty. Traditionally the spurs were fastened to the sovereign's feet, but since the Restoration they have simply been held to the ankles of kings, or in the case of queens regnant, presented and then placed on the altar. After the investiture the sovereign is crowned.
I'm a tad bit confused my fren. Is what your saying that this Austrailian land owner is actually the king but these ppl like "King Charles" just a pupet for the real royals or something type deal? I mean it would make sense as to why they actually haven't had a coronation for Charles yet, but that's the only thing that makes sense to me
Also btw if your saying this hastings person is the rightful king, would that mean they're a descendant of Harold hastings? If sooo that argument is completely moot due to Norman invasion