Frens- My mom developed what looks like a small ball on the bottom of her eye over some months. It is partially in the waterline. She refused to go to the doctor for reasons we can all understand. The size of this ball was a bit smaller in diameter than the back of a pen, or a pencil eraser. It became reddened, and started getting painful. She decides to go see her doctor. Doctor says it's cancer, and refers her to a specialist which she's still waiting to see. I asked her if she would like to try Ivermectin, and MMS while she waits. (If that failed then I was going to have her try fenbendazole.) She says yes.
I saw her today and couldn't believe my eyes. I don't think she could either. It's been a week and a half. The size of this mass is 1/2 what it was, no longer red or painful. This improvement was reached with (1) dose of Ivermectin according to her bodyweight, per day, and 2 drop doses of MMS 1-2x per day. She is taking it slow because I don't think she had a lot of faith it would do anything. Because she's taking both the Ivermectin and the MMS (internally and applied topically), I can't say 100% it's one over the other. But I can tell you I've never seen anything work so fast in my life. We don't know what the industry standard treatment protocol is for something like this. We assumed it would be some kind of cutting or radiation which she doesn't want.
We wanted to take before and after pictures, and we wanted to tell her doctor, but decided against it. Dr's simply can't be trusted anymore. I'm going to take a picture of it for our own before and after to put in our own medical reference manual. She's going to stay on it another week, then take a week break, then start again. Her appointment is at the end of May. I told her if we continue to see improvement we can reschedule the appointment, and give this a little more time to work. If/When it goes away she's planning on going to the dr for a follow up to see what he says. I thought you should know.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but chemically speaking, isn't MMS essentially just pool water? That's not to denigrate its effectiveness in any way (consider summers in the sun with all that vitamin D and all that chlorine water--you ever remember getting sick? I don't. In fact, I remember being sick until I went swimming and then the next day...gone). But isn't that basically what we're looking at there? Pool water?
https://www.scotmas.com/chlorine-dioxide/why-is-clo2-different-to-chlorine.aspx?locale=en While chlorine dioxide has “chlorine” in its name, its chemistry is radically different from that of chlorine. As we all learned in high school chemistry, we can mix two compounds and create a third that bears little resemblance to its parents. For instance, by mixing two parts of hydrogen gas with one of oxygen - liquid water is the formed. We should not be misled by the fact that chlorine and chlorine dioxide share a word in common. The chemistries of the two compounds are completely different.
Chlorine and chlorine dioxide are both oxidising agents (electron receivers). However, chlorine has the capacity to take in two electrons, whereas chlorine dioxide can absorb five. This means that, mole for mole, ClO2 is 2.6 times more effective than chlorine.
Bar Cl2 Clo2 Comparison
If equal, if not greater importance is the fact that chlorine dioxide will not react with many organic compounds, and as a result ClO2 does not produce environmentally dangerous chlorinated organics. For example; aromatic compounds have carbon atoms arranged in rings and they may have other atoms, such as chlorine, attached to these rings, to form a chlorinated aromatic - a highly toxic compound that persists in the environment long after it is produced.
Chlorine dioxide's behaviour as an oxidising agent is quite dissimilar. Like ozone, the predominant oxidation reaction mechanism for chlorine dioxide proceeds through a process known as free radical electrophilic (i.e. electron-attracting) abstraction rather than by oxidative substitution or addition (as in chlorinating agents such as chlorine or hypochlorite). This means that chlorinated organic compounds such as THMs and HAAs are not produced as a result of disinfection using chlorine dioxide