The ratio of agents to annual filers, 430:1 (IRS 75M:175K) is about double that of agents to those who annually cross the border illegally, 175:1 (3M:19K). The two ratios are not significantly different for the two contexts.
However, the need to address violations is totally disparate.
A very small percentage of tax filers are in violation of the law.
100% of illegal crossings are in violation of the law.
This agent ratio infers the Biden Administration believes that nearly every tax filing is fraudulent (or that illegal crossing is not illegal).
Then I think, which of the two is a short-term net income gain for the DS?
Which of the two more quickly imperils the US?
The ratio of agents to annual filers, 430:1 (IRS 75M:175K) is about double that of agents to those who annually cross the border illegally, 175:1 (3M:19K). The two ratios are not significantly different for the two contexts.
However, the need to address violations is totally disparate. A very small percentage of tax filers are in violation of the law. 100% of illegal crossings are in violation of the law. This agent ratio infers the Biden Administration believes that nearly every tax filing is fraudulent (or that illegal crossing is not illegal).
Then I think, which of the two is a short-term net income gain for the DS? Which of the two more quickly imperils the US?