1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Al Sharpton isn't any more effective ...

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe for the "rev" Jesse Jackson?

3
Thomath 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm waiting for minorities - those Schumer infers are not capable of getting an ID - to begin filing lawsuits against those on the list that require IDs.
And presenting their supportive evidence: (Democrat) Congressional leaders and supportive judges that declare such IDs are racist.

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

Her belief is that her thinking on immigration is "good" and ICE is "evil" and chose to do something to punish/hurt them and the family.

  • That is the role of LE and the judicial system (not hers or mine)

  • She does not consider that others would believe themselves as "good" and her as "evil"

  • Wanting to hurt someone based not on violation of law but on their beliefs only leads to anarchy.

4
Thomath 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would like to know how many per president were overturned on appeal. I believe that would point out the frivolous nature of the actions.

6
Thomath 6 points ago +6 / -0

My mom shared stories told to her by her great aunt, one of the 17 child survivors, a Fancher.

It also occurred on 9/11

6
Thomath 6 points ago +6 / -0

Joe Rogan announces a study showing Pfizer mRNA shots killed between 460K and 600K and Moderna does this. Hmmm.

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump DOJ should continue to prosecute Fauci, Milley, J6 Committee, etc.

  • Force them each to accept the pardon for the specified crime(s), effectively admitting guilt, and removing all 5th amendment protections.

  • Then force them to testify against all others that worked with them in their crimes. Let them become the primary sources for the (RICO) crimes they jointly committed.

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump DOJ should continue to prosecute Fauci, Milley, J6 Committee, etc.

  • Force them each to accept the pardon for the specified crime(s), effectively admitting guilt, and removing all 5th amendment protections.

  • Then force them to testify against all others that worked with them in their crimes. Let them become the primary sources for the (RICO) crimes they jointly committed.

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obviously their current living conditions (no homes to live in) will pass inspection just fine.

3
Thomath 3 points ago +3 / -0

The watch reads 6:08 from his perspective and with the side nob being at the "3" position. The camera position / perspective is inverted.

10
Thomath 10 points ago +10 / -0

Probably didn't want to hear him go on and on about he knows how she feels because his first-responder son, Beau, "also died in the line of action."

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

To quote them, "Why be concerned if a 3-letter agency is tracking you - if you've done nothing wrong."

They know.

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump in the Oval Office, did what Trump did beforehand.

  • He negotiated in the best interests of what he represented.

Biden in the Oval Office, did what Biden did beforehand.

  • He extorted, bribed, blackmailed, and lied in the best interests of ... himself.
15
Thomath 15 points ago +15 / -0

But still good enough to be on the Spokane County Superior Court without a working knowledge of the Constitution.

3
Thomath 3 points ago +3 / -0

Post is 9 yrs old and still true.

Non zealous are happy with the freedoms they have.

Zealous are happy to have an enemy gov't to work to overthrow.

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd like to see the impact on the emigration numbers out of El Salvador into the US. It would be a tell-tale on how many are doing so to escape violence (asylum seeking) and how many are for economic reasons.

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden took office and quickly continued a systemic purge within the military - conservatives, "QAnon", Trump appointees, non-woke, etc. This purge began when he was vice president (under Obama), and was picked up again in 2017. My assumption is that they were trying to stack the deck in case the military stepped in.

My concern is the current military could be as bad as the DS.

6
Thomath 6 points ago +6 / -0

The ratio of agents to annual filers, 430:1 (IRS 75M:175K) is about double that of agents to those who annually cross the border illegally, 175:1 (3M:19K). The two ratios are not significantly different for the two contexts.

However, the need to address violations is totally disparate. A very small percentage of tax filers are in violation of the law. 100% of illegal crossings are in violation of the law. This agent ratio infers the Biden Administration believes that nearly every tax filing is fraudulent (or that illegal crossing is not illegal).

Then I think, which of the two is a short-term net income gain for the DS? Which of the two more quickly imperils the US?

view more: Next ›