1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump in the Oval Office, did what Trump did beforehand.

  • He negotiated in the best interests of what he represented.

Biden in the Oval Office, did what Biden did beforehand.

  • He extorted, bribed, blackmailed, and lied in the best interests of ... himself.
15
Thomath 15 points ago +15 / -0

But still good enough to be on the Spokane County Superior Court without a working knowledge of the Constitution.

3
Thomath 3 points ago +3 / -0

Post is 9 yrs old and still true.

Non zealous are happy with the freedoms they have.

Zealous are happy to have an enemy gov't to work to overthrow.

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd like to see the impact on the emigration numbers out of El Salvador into the US. It would be a tell-tale on how many are doing so to escape violence (asylum seeking) and how many are for economic reasons.

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden took office and quickly continued a systemic purge within the military - conservatives, "QAnon", Trump appointees, non-woke, etc. This purge began when he was vice president (under Obama), and was picked up again in 2017. My assumption is that they were trying to stack the deck in case the military stepped in.

My concern is the current military could be as bad as the DS.

6
Thomath 6 points ago +6 / -0

The ratio of agents to annual filers, 430:1 (IRS 75M:175K) is about double that of agents to those who annually cross the border illegally, 175:1 (3M:19K). The two ratios are not significantly different for the two contexts.

However, the need to address violations is totally disparate. A very small percentage of tax filers are in violation of the law. 100% of illegal crossings are in violation of the law. This agent ratio infers the Biden Administration believes that nearly every tax filing is fraudulent (or that illegal crossing is not illegal).

Then I think, which of the two is a short-term net income gain for the DS? Which of the two more quickly imperils the US?

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

Met my wife 45 yrs, 1 mo, & 3 days ago. Married her 15 mo. later. Every year has been better than the one before.

They gave her less than 2 years to live - many autoimmune issues. That was 26 years ago. She's healthier now than she was then.

God is good.

All the time.

10
Thomath 10 points ago +10 / -0

They say that married couples, after living together for decades, begin to look more alike. I assume the same happens when one fraternizes with evil.

4
Thomath 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do landscaping / gardening work in the yard. Nothing like seeing what a bit of diligent care and feeding (along with prayer and the amazing hand of God) can do with an area of poor clay soil. Short term.

I also volunteer and do similar with hurting people. Longer term.

And know the same can be done with our country.

-1
Thomath -1 points ago +1 / -2

In my career, I've (many a time) had to do tasks that were no fun, but were necessary to do. You are doing the same with work like this.

Thank you.

(You also get first eyes on a lot of very good information, discoveries, analyses, etc. That's a good benefit. Hang on to that when the mod-days get long!)

Thanks again.

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Classified documents are "signed out" to an individual and are tracked. The receiving individual assures that when they are not personally handling them, that the documents are in an approved "secure storage."

  • Whoever was responsible for tracking, failed in their job.

  • A "locked garage" in no way qualifies for approved "secure storage."

  • Inference was he wasn't even aware that they were there.

"How could he be so irresponsible!" to quote someone near to the issue.

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree on your comment. That was my understanding also. The "premeditated' part coming from the DoD in setting up bio-weapon attack countermeasures.

I would not rule out any links to the Global Community in those early stages. I am not aware that such links existed in the DoD world 10 or 15 years ago. I believe that Obama and Biden have done much to more firmly align the two (Global & DoD) - to the corruption and weakening of the Military.

Note: I do not generally align the DoD (Senior leadership - Leans Political) and the Military (Leans Patriotic.)

9
Thomath 9 points ago +9 / -0

Let me think about this:

  • The DoD has a plan to address a bio-weapon attack.

  • Early on, the DoD views C-19 as a bio-weapon attack - an act of war.

  • They quietly implement "Countermeasures" in response.

  • Public is kept in the dark. No need to raise tension and risk a bigger "war."

  • Liability immune DoD efforts are granted and then extended to FDA, CDC, ...

  • FDA, CDC, ... efforts are extended to WHO, HHS, ...

  • Global community sees this as an opportunity. Never let a "crisis" go to waste. And they take the lead on mandating no-liability "countermeasures" toward their own objectives.

  • The DoD quiets down and lets the Globalists "take the lead."

Is that the proper summary / understanding?

4
Thomath 4 points ago +4 / -0

I do not need more proof.

Sadly though there are many out there who still do not see any SADS-Vaccine link. The more proofs to spread around the better. I will share this ... also.

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

This will protect him from nothing. Nothing. He has to know that.

Libs underlying "Rule of Law" is "The End justifies the Means." If they think any kind of dis/mis-information, any kind of slander, any kind of mock investigation will help their endgame, it easily falls within their understanding of "Rule of Law."

I see "Rule of Law" in its true meaning and would like to see it enforced more evenly and thoroughly upon our "ruling elite," (the political / media / big-Tech / big-Pharma / big-... class)

2
Thomath 2 points ago +2 / -0

Presidential Cognizance.

National average for gasoline first hit $5 in June of 2022.

It only took him 17 months (there's that number again) to realize he was "president."

1
Thomath 1 point ago +1 / -0

Close. Linked by CasuallyObservant is the "Royal Standard of the United Kingdom".

In the picture is the "Royal Standard of the United Kingdom for use in Scotland" It is very similar, but quadrant arrangement and content is slightly varied.

Not enough of an issue to address - unless one is being quite particular regarding official royal protocol ...

Good find to CasuallyObservant.

3
Thomath 3 points ago +3 / -0

And if they do run out of names, they will simply re-define words. They have no limit.

4
Thomath 4 points ago +4 / -0

I had experience with this 25 years ago. Three friends began having multiple health issues hit them in their late 30's, early 40's. All three - Heart. Pulmonary. Autoimmune. Pain disorders. Diabetes. and Cancer, and more. All three were given 18 to 24 months to live. Two had Dr's go the standard path: Standard health protocol/practice per issue. The third had a Dr that chose a tailored healthcare path that took into consideration all the issues AND their interactions - meaning some of the treatments for a specific issue (e.g., Cervical Cancer) were NOT the recommended path (hysterectomy and synthetic hormones for life.) The first two were gone within 2 years. The third, my best friend, is healthier today than 25 years ago.

The healthcare for an individual doesn't always fit the standard ICD (International Classification of Diseases) recommendation. Hospitals and healthcare facilities hide behind ICD for cost (read that as "liability") reasons. That may still be in the best interest for most individuals - but not all.

view more: Next ›