That's the problem with standing purely on the research of others.
Now you're just being rude. I "stand" on nothing. I showed you a reference and stated that there were many more. I am happy to show you more, but only if you are willing to actually look, because it takes time to dig them out since I haven't written up that particular part of my investigation formally.
Your reference isn't in any way contradictory to mine btw. On the contrary, I stated explicilty that the Celts (of which Gogmagog is a Celtish Legend) were the Scythians. So it is entirely possible that that giant (if indeed he existed and indeed his name was "Gogmagog" and not "Cawr-Madog" as your reference states) was a Scythian, perhaps THE Scythian who founded the Scythian outpost on the Island, or otherwise subjugated the indigenous population.
Regardless of that, you have by no means shown me anything that suggests that the giant Gogmagog is in any way tied to the "Mogogians" of the Bible. The very reference you cited states explicitly that it is likely a confusion of names (not that I believe that, but you haven't shown me evidence to support your case).
Now you're just being rude. I "stand" on nothing. I showed you a reference and stated that there were many more. I am happy to show you more, but only if you are willing to actually look, because it takes time to dig them out since I haven't written up that particular part of my investigation formally.
Your reference isn't in any way contradictory to mine btw. On the contrary, I stated explicilty that the Celts (of which Gogmagog is a Celtish Legend) were the Scythians. So it is entirely possible that that giant (if indeed he existed and indeed his name was "Gogmagog" and not "Cawr-Madog" as your reference states) was a Scythian, perhaps THE Scythian who founded the Scythian outpost on the Island, or otherwise subjugated the indigenous population.
Regardless of that, you have by no means shown me anything that suggests that the giant Gogmagog is in any way tied to the "Mogogians" of the Bible. The very reference you cited states explicitly that it is likely a confusion of names (not that I believe that, but you haven't shown me evidence to support your case).