I have not personally investigated details beyond proving to myself it must be a type of sphere, no. No other topology will work. Not a torus. Not flat.
You can find the standard model by searching on something as simple as Wikipedia. As already stated, I accept the complete standard model with a different level of conviction than I do the information I have personally proven, which is that the earth must be a sphere of some kind due to positive curvature everywhere. I am already very aware of the mathematics behind curvature detection, so I do not need to research that. The triangle method I stated earlier is absolutely definitive.
The exact details you mention do not particularly interest me. They are irrelevant to my life, and nobody has ever given me a valid reason to care about the relevant accuracy the standard model. But if this is of significant interest to you, I definitely encourage you to follow your curiosity.
Interesting.
So you haven't personally looked into this stuff?
You have no reason to doubt the standard model.
Sounds like some sort of spheroid is outside the standard model.
You should research people "detecting curvature".
What is the math? What is the standard model you are referring to?
I have not personally investigated details beyond proving to myself it must be a type of sphere, no. No other topology will work. Not a torus. Not flat.
You can find the standard model by searching on something as simple as Wikipedia. As already stated, I accept the complete standard model with a different level of conviction than I do the information I have personally proven, which is that the earth must be a sphere of some kind due to positive curvature everywhere. I am already very aware of the mathematics behind curvature detection, so I do not need to research that. The triangle method I stated earlier is absolutely definitive.
The exact details you mention do not particularly interest me. They are irrelevant to my life, and nobody has ever given me a valid reason to care about the relevant accuracy the standard model. But if this is of significant interest to you, I definitely encourage you to follow your curiosity.
Sure sounds good.
Too bad you won't look into anything yourself. You might find all your convictions false.
Explain the spectacular triangle method you use? Show the real math? Is this the only proof of what you arw saying or do you have more to tell me?
The fact you think it is irrelevant to your life amazes me.
I literally can't believe you are telling the truth or are even a saying genuine things because you think it is irrelevant.
If you want to end the conversation that is fine, I'm good to go still. Either way enjoy your day and may God bless you if it is God's will.