Dylan Eleven (did this test himself I believe)
We have posted several articles on testing the vaccinated for a bluetooth signal using an android phone switched into developer mode. iPhones were not so easy until I found an App called BLE Scanner 4.0.
I have just tested and app on an iPhone without switching into developer mode and successfully picked up the signals from the vaccinated using this App.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
My Tests and Results
• BLE Scanner 4.0 downloaded from the Apple app store on an iPhone XR, software version 14.2.
• Inside a large Faraday cage 20 feet x 20 feet, with no wireless radiation present at all.
• Tested extensively with BLE Scanner App, found no signals at all.
• Tested extensively with high-end wireless radiation tester that picks up Bluetooth wifi and cellular signals; found no signals at all.
• Tested the area with 5 different unvaccinated people and the BLE Scanner app showed no signals at all.
• Tested the environment with the BLE Scanner App with 3 vaccinated people, found 4 bluetooth signals. All signals listed as N/A name not available. Each person had no bluetooth devices on them, air tags, watches or phones etc.
• Did extensive testing on distance from the subjects, showed clear relationship between the signal and distance to each person. The app shows the distance of each signal -25 very close to -60 futher away.
• Tested with 3 different vaccinated people found 6 signals.
• Tested with all 6 vaccinated people together and found 10 signals.
• Tested distances and removing people, direct correlation in the app.
It seems that some of the people were emitting only one signal and others more than one.
The vaccinated signal had a N/A for the name.
As a control I tried the app outside the Faraday cage in different locations and picked up several devices, Samsung TVs etc, and lots of N/A (name not available) which in my experiments were the vaccinated.
Try downloading BLE Scanner 4.0 on your iPhone and do your own tests.
I'm an electrical and electronics engineer, I work as an expert witness in these fields amongst other things. I have some problems with this theory:
In the most basic of terms wouldn't a person heavily polluted with various heavy metals be a walking antenna?
How do you explain putting a car key fob to your chin and making the signal reach farther to the car you are trying to start?
Could a person with nano tech in their body possibly amplify the signal they are producing by holding a device such as a cellphone?
What do you think of intra body nano technology?
Thank you, you've said everything I wanted to say about this.
Good info to look at & digest. I appreciate this input.
The newest approach involves graphene-based plasmonic antennas. Unlike plasmonic antennas based on noble metals, these would allow smart dust to operate at frequencies at least 100 times (and in principle perhaps 1000 times) smaller than is possible using a conventional metallic antenna.
The operating principle is that an electromagnetic (EM) wave directed onto a graphene surface perpendicular to that surface excites the electrons in the graphene into oscillations. These electrons interact with those in the dielectric material on which the graphene is mounted, thereby forming surface plasmon polaritons (SPP).
When the antenna becomes resonant (meaning that an integral number of SPP wavelengths fit into the physical dimensions of the graphene), the coupling of the SPP and the external EM waves increases greatly, resulting in efficient transfer of energy between the two.