Born too late to explore the world. Born too stupid and untalented to explore space as part of a super secret program. Born just in time to watch everything change.
Reminds me how someone on Badlands (might have been Zak) was floating the theory a couple weeks back that some of the current-day space footage that sometimes looks faked might be faked actually to hide the real current state of the space program.
20 minutes of narrative. Not a single item of evidence. Why is it, then, that in a world where we have supposedly been in contact with and the beneficiaries of alien civilization and technology for over 65 years---there is no evidence in our daily lives that any of this is true?
For me, the tell was his reference to the "much maligned" George Adamski. When I was a teenager, I read Adamski's books and was thrilled with the implications. Not so thrilled when it came out much later that he was a fraud and his photos were hoaxes.
A powerful technology cannot really remain a secret, if it is being researched and exploited. Technologies make ripples in the knowledge base of our civilization. There would be effects. But there are none. I have come to realize that it is not simply that "talk is cheap"---but that "talk is cheapest."
Born too late to explore the world. Born too stupid and untalented to explore space as part of a super secret program. Born just in time to watch everything change.
best seats in the house
Reminds me how someone on Badlands (might have been Zak) was floating the theory a couple weeks back that some of the current-day space footage that sometimes looks faked might be faked actually to hide the real current state of the space program.
It only looks faked to the people who don't understand what the reality looks like and substitute prejudicial supposition as a standard of comparison.
20 minutes of narrative. Not a single item of evidence. Why is it, then, that in a world where we have supposedly been in contact with and the beneficiaries of alien civilization and technology for over 65 years---there is no evidence in our daily lives that any of this is true?
For me, the tell was his reference to the "much maligned" George Adamski. When I was a teenager, I read Adamski's books and was thrilled with the implications. Not so thrilled when it came out much later that he was a fraud and his photos were hoaxes.
A powerful technology cannot really remain a secret, if it is being researched and exploited. Technologies make ripples in the knowledge base of our civilization. There would be effects. But there are none. I have come to realize that it is not simply that "talk is cheap"---but that "talk is cheapest."