Think about it: a lot of the judges who shot them down were even Trump-appointed judges. Were the lawyers involved in these suits too stupid to know what would and wouldn't get them standing?

I've thought about this a lot. Thought about how much harder fraud is to prove than simply proving that an election shouldn't stand based on what factually occurred at the time, whether it was intentional or not. It's like putting the thumb on your opponent's scale. Any good lawyer knows that when a higher charge is too iffy, you settle for the lesser charge. I keep looking at all these suits and they keep trying to prove in court that there was fraud, which is intentional, which would not only require the actions observed and recorded, but proof that what was happening was coordinated and intentional, which, of course, they're not going to have all of that. Or maybe they do (I think they do), but the plan called for Donald to play shadow president for 4 years while fake Biden takes the country seemingly to the edge of oblivion.

But when you think in terms of the Q plan, how it had to be this way, despite all of Trump's grandstanding and huffing and puffing about the election, to see all these highly capable lawyers just get swatted away left and right by judges all over the country...something doesn't smell right to me. Something tells me all the lawyers fighting for Trump (perhaps with the exception of the Mormon trumpet players from Utah) were part of the show. They brought intentionally weak cases that wouldn't qualify for standing so they could appear to be trying to fight this in court, when they really had no intention of doing so, because it would be almost too easy to prove, and putting Trump right back into the White House wasn't part of the plan right now.

So here we are, huffing and puffing about this painfully obvious fact that the election was stolen and no judge will even taken the case and suddenly I'm thinking..."Oh shit. Maybe the patriots have more control than I thought."