This incident informs us of malice, not just stupidity. To give the anti gun activist the benefit of the doubt, we can assume he started off ignorant of the value of the second amendment and lived by his ignorance by not having a gun. At some point, maybe after studying gun issues more deeply because of his activism, he learned the value of the right to bear arms and got himself a gun. But he didn’t stop being an anti-gun activist. It’s now obvious that he has no principles about going gun-free, that he just wants to disarm others. And he shot a person. Whom he might’ve assumed was unarmed. Presumably unarmed because of activism from people like him. He has the Bolshevik attitude of a genocider. This is not a game, folks.
This incident informs us of malice, not just stupidity. To give the anti gun activist the benefit of the doubt, we can assume he started off ignorant of the value of the second amendment and lived by his ignorance by not having a gun. At some point, maybe after studying gun issues more deeply because of his activism, he learned the value of the right to bear arms and got himself a gun. But he didn’t stop being an anti-gun activist. It’s now obvious that he has no principles about going gun-free, that he just wants to disarm others. And he shot a person. Whom he might’ve assumed was unarmed. Presumably unarmed because of activism from people like him. He has the Bolshevik attitude of a genocider. This is not a game, folks.