You didn't comprehend the entire thread did you? Those actual actions were addressed previously in the thread containing the message you're replying to
So you comprehended yet chose to ignore all the other actions, plus the fact that he used to change his profile all the time but has intentionally been Satan armor for more than half a year, to focus only on "he wore this thing for Halloween". Interesting. Not what I would have expected, particularly not from someone interested in dialog.
So you're saying I should instead take a cue from you and imply that the people I'm talking to are unable to comprehend what I'm saying instead of just assuming it wasn't comprehended. I suppose that level of projected intellectual superiority is less snotty
Um, so, a person is now defined by a costume that they wear, rather than the actions that they actual take?
I don't think so...
You didn't comprehend the entire thread did you? Those actual actions were addressed previously in the thread containing the message you're replying to
I read it all, and personally, I think I comprehended it fine.
I won't argue about whether YOU comprehended any of the arguments challenging your positions, because that would really be futile.
Hey, by the way, why not try just a little to be not so argumentative, aggressive, and downright snotty. Or not. Either way.
So you comprehended yet chose to ignore all the other actions, plus the fact that he used to change his profile all the time but has intentionally been Satan armor for more than half a year, to focus only on "he wore this thing for Halloween". Interesting. Not what I would have expected, particularly not from someone interested in dialog.
So you're saying I should instead take a cue from you and imply that the people I'm talking to are unable to comprehend what I'm saying instead of just assuming it wasn't comprehended. I suppose that level of projected intellectual superiority is less snotty