It wasn't David Rockefeller, it was "Nick" Rockefeller, who tried to recruit Aaron Russo. The entire 12 minute interview is worth listening to because Russo correctly said the War on Terrorism was a PsyOp to scare people to give up their rights.And, to wage war against the American people. In fact, Representative Paul Gosar reveals that the 'COVID' Emergency declaration was an advancement of War on Terrorism to waging War on a Virus (fraudulent). The enemy was all those who refused to wear face masks and get jabbed. There's more going on here and it has to do with the expanding declaration of war on human behavior (i.e. hate, fear, freedom, etc.).
This was all used to enact the police state in America. The fiction of 'terrorists' being everywhere is no different than the SARS-CoV2 virus. Instead of metal detectors and back-scatter X-ray machines, we are forced to submit to PCR tests in order to travel and work. Do you see the expansion of the police state here? Just as America's 'War on Terror' has been an irrational distortion and lie, the war on COVID-19 is the same where are still forced to submit to invasive medical testing. The coerced vax☠xination of the public is still ongoing.
What specifically constitutes 'terrorism'? Who is specifically the enemy?
Terrorism is not ever really defined. It can be anywhere, anyone, at anytime. The root word for 'terrorism' is 'terror' and is defined when a person or people feels "intense, sharp, overmastering fear", whether real or not. In other words, it is a psychological state of mind. It is impossible to declare war on an psychological state of mind. Yet, this is precisely what has occurred. The word terrorist is constantly evolving and now can mean a person or thing that is especially annoying or unpleasant to an opposing party.
The 'War on Terrorism' is actually a PsyOp used on the American people. I believe this has it's origins in the divorce industry used by lawyers to weaponize parental custody battles. Yes, you heard me right. As incredible as this sounds, there is a huge payoff for lawyers and anyone involved in this industry. As it so often turns out, following the money leads us to the source. The democrats like to go after your children, especially if you are deemed an enemy to them. You can read more here.
Many years ago (in the 1990s) I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? As a result, a male is required to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.
Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.
It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.
The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.
TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] + -ISM (suggestion by another)...if one consents to a suggested -ism by another, then the other gains the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested...which in return frightens the one who shirked response-ability (choice) onto another.
fear
Both hope (want) and fear (not want) implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin (need)...always a choice.
a psychological state of mind
LOGIC (reasoning over suggested) tempts one to ignore PSYCHE (breath, spirit, soul aka adaptation to perceivable).
When I stated "Terrorism is not really defined", I was referring to statutory law. It is indeed ambiguous and purposely done so for the 'color' of law. I provided a link in my comment for further reading and insight to this. The rest of the 'story' goes like this:
Many years ago (in the 1990s) I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? As a result, a male is required to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.
Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.
It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.
The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.
I do see him as a traitorous White elite. When some WN folks put all the blame on 'Jews' I point to folks like Rockerfeller, Biden and others who see themselves as a separate Elite class above all else. Sure there are jewish elite like the Rothchilds and their circle. These 2 factions many group together as Lizard People.
My view on many Whites would be they often have a hubris in thinking all folks can and should conduct themselves by OUR standards and moral outlook. It makes many blind to differences in culture, good and bad.
It wasn't David Rockefeller, it was "Nick" Rockefeller, who tried to recruit Aaron Russo. The entire 12 minute interview is worth listening to because Russo correctly said the War on Terrorism was a PsyOp to scare people to give up their rights.And, to wage war against the American people. In fact, Representative Paul Gosar reveals that the 'COVID' Emergency declaration was an advancement of War on Terrorism to waging War on a Virus (fraudulent). The enemy was all those who refused to wear face masks and get jabbed. There's more going on here and it has to do with the expanding declaration of war on human behavior (i.e. hate, fear, freedom, etc.).
This was all used to enact the police state in America. The fiction of 'terrorists' being everywhere is no different than the SARS-CoV2 virus. Instead of metal detectors and back-scatter X-ray machines, we are forced to submit to PCR tests in order to travel and work. Do you see the expansion of the police state here? Just as America's 'War on Terror' has been an irrational distortion and lie, the war on COVID-19 is the same where are still forced to submit to invasive medical testing. The coerced vax☠xination of the public is still ongoing.
What specifically constitutes 'terrorism'? Who is specifically the enemy?
Terrorism is not ever really defined. It can be anywhere, anyone, at anytime. The root word for 'terrorism' is 'terror' and is defined when a person or people feels "intense, sharp, overmastering fear", whether real or not. In other words, it is a psychological state of mind. It is impossible to declare war on an psychological state of mind. Yet, this is precisely what has occurred. The word terrorist is constantly evolving and now can mean a person or thing that is especially annoying or unpleasant to an opposing party.
The 'War on Terrorism' is actually a PsyOp used on the American people. I believe this has it's origins in the divorce industry used by lawyers to weaponize parental custody battles. Yes, you heard me right. As incredible as this sounds, there is a huge payoff for lawyers and anyone involved in this industry. As it so often turns out, following the money leads us to the source. The democrats like to go after your children, especially if you are deemed an enemy to them. You can read more here.
Good analysis of the tyranny we are in.
I posted more in the comment section on where the "War on Terror" originated. The complete posting is found here.
Many years ago (in the 1990s) I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? As a result, a male is required to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.
Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.
It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.
The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.
TER'ROR, noun [Latin terreo, to frighten.] + -ISM (suggestion by another)...if one consents to a suggested -ism by another, then the other gains the power of ones consent to define; redefine and contradict the suggested...which in return frightens the one who shirked response-ability (choice) onto another.
Both hope (want) and fear (not want) implies towards suggested outcomes; while ignoring perceivable origin (need)...always a choice.
LOGIC (reasoning over suggested) tempts one to ignore PSYCHE (breath, spirit, soul aka adaptation to perceivable).
When I stated "Terrorism is not really defined", I was referring to statutory law. It is indeed ambiguous and purposely done so for the 'color' of law. I provided a link in my comment for further reading and insight to this. The rest of the 'story' goes like this:
Many years ago (in the 1990s) I stumbled across this revelation reviewing State statutes on domestic abuse. The Violence Against Women's Act (VAWA) has institutionalized the State's issuance of ex parte orders of protection by the mere allegation whether real or fraudulent. Sound familiar? As a result, a male is required to prove his innocence if a female accuses him of any type of domestic abuse or harassment. Advocates for the battered women’s shelter supported by public money, serve primarily to promote the expulsion of men from their homes without due process of law. This is the first step in taking children away from the father and granting of custody to the State approved 'guardian-ward'; the mother. These centers also serve to promote abortion, divorce, and the prevention of reconciliation between husband and wife. The affidavit forms have become entirely automated for women to file and be processed. All a female needs to claim is that she 'fears for her safety'. An ensuing exparte order will be signed by a judge or administrative officer to remove the accused male from his home and prohibiting further contact with his wife and children. Evidence for physical abuse is not required and the only female rationale needed is being fearful of the male to trigger domestic abuse laws. As part of domestic abuse law is 'terroristic threats', which legally means to "threaten, directly or indirectly or otherwise cause serious public inconvenience, or in a reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or inconvenience". A 'fear' crime is ambiguous and extremely difficult to be vindicated of. It is estimated that 66% of all domestic abuse charges are false. Incarceration is quite common for the male. After his release, he is always expelled from his own home and ordered not to return. A magistrate will hear the case, but he will not be able to return to his house unless she allows him too.
Not since prior to the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 AD, which guaranteed a sovereign citizen’s right not to be ordered from their home, have such police powers been carried out. Tens of thousands of innocent men have been thrown out of their homes and onto the streets, unsheltered, often on perjured affidavits. Nobody is ever prosecuted for these perjured affidavits, even where the proof is abundant.
It is a weaponized system to prevent reconciliation and to criminalize an entire demographic of males. So successful has this operation been, an entire multi-billion dollar industry has been institutionalized. We find that the word 'terror' and 'terroristic acts' is ambiguous, but is lawfully imposed by saying- 'fearing for one's safety'. Divorce attorneys coach their clients to say these four words. It's been very successful for lawyers, so much so that profiting off from fear and 'terrorism' has since expanded to other demographics, such as MAGA supporters, military, constitutionalists, Christians, and patriots, while Antifa, BLM, satanists, pedophiles, and radical communists are not considered 'terrorists'.
The war on 'COVID' is yet another expansion of their PsyOp using 'fear' (terror) for control and designed to remove all our rights. It is enslaving us all.
R.I.P. Arron
Still Mad As HELL
I do see him as a traitorous White elite. When some WN folks put all the blame on 'Jews' I point to folks like Rockerfeller, Biden and others who see themselves as a separate Elite class above all else. Sure there are jewish elite like the Rothchilds and their circle. These 2 factions many group together as Lizard People.
My view on many Whites would be they often have a hubris in thinking all folks can and should conduct themselves by OUR standards and moral outlook. It makes many blind to differences in culture, good and bad.