First, the main evidence, as I understand it, required the court to conclude that something nefarious happened by inference. Her claim was the ballots must have been cleared with malice because the pace was too fast. That’s a tough case to prove.
The judge was probably feeling a lot like a cartel boss might hang him headless from an overpass if he did the right thing. Sure, that suggests judicial cowardice but most would succumb to that kind of threat. Courage is rare in our society.
But my main takeaway is the same as it was when she was screwed the first time: Kari Lake as a screaming Valkyrie for justice is probably more powerful in an information war than Kari Lake the Governor of Arizona.
Her voice is piercing and fearless.
Would I rather have seen her win? Sure. Would the best outcome for the information war be the same as her winning? I’m not so sure.
(Professor Patriot)
I watched Kari Lake's recent trial! Her lawyers presented irrefutable evidence. That judge is definitely compromised. The defense attys for Hobbs argued that if the judge rules for Lake it would be removing a duly elected governor! That's ludicrous as we know Hobbs would not have been elected due to Maricopa Cty not following their own law(s)! That it would be removing a fraudulent winner! And, on the days just following all those 297,000 unverified signature ballots!
Hobbs & Maricopa Cty are by far an organized crime operation; the whole states' elected individuals are in on the cartel, judges included!
Hopefully the recent ruling on using no machines will somewhat tamper down the election fraud in AZ!
I hope Kari Lake appeals to a higher court within her state!