Specifically, how the following context and turn of events may come into play as we move forward with DECLAS:
Bank Markazi has argued that the lawsuit was not allowed under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), which generally shields foreign governments from liability in U.S. courts.
In January 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling in the families' favor, and ordered the case to be reconsidered in light of the new law, adopted a month earlier as part of the National Defense Authorization Act.
Preska said the 2019 law authorizes U.S. courts to allow the seizure of assets held outside the country to satisfy judgments against Iran in terrorism cases, "notwithstanding" other laws such as FSIA that would grant immunity.
Look at that timing. January 2020 —> impeachment, first COVID cases hitting the US. But also some kind of new law that allows asset seizure from central banks in cases of terrorism.
Same judge involved in Giuffre v. Maxwell and the doe unsealing. Still waiting on that to be uploaded, but this ruling seems promising to me if foreign surveillance and blackmail is involved.
If other countries can have their banking assets seized due to terrorism suits, could money be taken from Rothschild Co./Intelligence Agencies for any involvement in 9/11? For Benghazi? Is that part of the reason why the Roths took their bank private?
This just seems like it opens a can of worms that foreign adversaries do not want open.
Specifically, how the following context and turn of events may come into play as we move forward with DECLAS:
Look at that timing. January 2020 —> impeachment, first COVID cases hitting the US. But also some kind of new law that allows asset seizure from central banks in cases of terrorism.
Same judge involved in Giuffre v. Maxwell and the doe unsealing. Still waiting on that to be uploaded, but this ruling seems promising to me if foreign surveillance and blackmail is involved.
If other countries can have their banking assets seized due to terrorism suits, could money be taken from Rothschild Co./Intelligence Agencies for any involvement in 9/11? For Benghazi? Is that part of the reason why the Roths took their bank private?
This just seems like it opens a can of worms that foreign adversaries do not want open.