"Mr. Mayorkas — another “official” with no proper sworn oath on file — is committing treason ..."
Well, no he's not. Sedition probably, but not treason, FOR THE VERY REASON THAT HE HAS NOT SWORN AN OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA.
Without having taken the oath, none of these commies are committing treason. Taking the oath of office is required by law for all of them, yet they have not done so. So no, not treason... but they should all be rounded up and put before military tribunals for SEDITION.
In the broadest sense, perhaps. But I was thinking about the legal definition of treason, and anyone who has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Without the oath of office, which is a legal requirement for anyone holding federal office, they have broken that law and have committed sedition, but not treason since they never swore an oath in the first place.
"Mr. Mayorkas — another “official” with no proper sworn oath on file — is committing treason ..."
Well, no he's not. Sedition probably, but not treason, FOR THE VERY REASON THAT HE HAS NOT SWORN AN OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE USA.
Without having taken the oath, none of these commies are committing treason. Taking the oath of office is required by law for all of them, yet they have not done so. So no, not treason... but they should all be rounded up and put before military tribunals for SEDITION.
How many of those who declined to sign and make the Oath have received foreign funding? China, Ukraine, etc etc,
That makes it Treason.
In the broadest sense, perhaps. But I was thinking about the legal definition of treason, and anyone who has sworn an oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Without the oath of office, which is a legal requirement for anyone holding federal office, they have broken that law and have committed sedition, but not treason since they never swore an oath in the first place.