I don't think I can agree. these boycotts serve as proof that we are the majority, and an expression of our values. the idea that corrupt companies should be propped up to benefit their employees sounds like it came straight from Target PR. That's why you shouldn't rely on a corrupt corporation for your livelihood. if they refused to support such a company, they would already have new jobs.
its time to pull the rug out from under them. God will provide.
Hmm, by now we're supposed to be sentimentally bonded to 'our' very own 'iconic American brands'??? And even be demoralized at their loss?
If so, how did such calculated emotional manipulation happen? Are people really expected to be driven by irrational (inculcated) loyalties that are actually -not at all- in our own best interests?
Just to look at the beer situation - their only response so far has been to repeatedly attempt to drive the mindless herd back into its corral emotionally, by guessing what surefire iconic imagery should work.
No soul searching, no attempt at self-awareness, understanding or true dialogue, no apology for attempting (by economic force) to socially engineer others into their own privately held ideological systems. To engineer thought, vs. respectfully persuade.
It was the predatory big box stores that -intentionally- came in and destroyed almost all local mom & pop stores in virtually every community. By evil design.
They diverted profits sustaining countless families and local economies, to a very narrow group of multinational profiteers; employed people who had to augment their poverty level pay with public assistance; and flooded America with tons of cheap products from China, etc. - oops, by the way 'accidentally' helping destroy our own manufacturing jobs.
This is far more a key part of the fascist globalist/monopolist strategy, vs. sentimentally 'American'. Other entities (like local chambers of commerce) have also been strategically captured, by bribes, blackmail or secret handshakes.
None of this seems 'of the people, by the people, and for the people'. It's far more like the revolutionary agenda of communism: to capture the means of production and distribution, and so re-create nations of people into a new herd of economic and political serfs.
The Clinton involvement with Walmart from the beginning, e.g., in retrospect raises questions of possible globalist agendas, and thus how much of people's loyalty such big box global businesses actually deserve.
if the cost of overcoming wokeness is a few dead box stores, i think we can manage.
I don't think I can agree. these boycotts serve as proof that we are the majority, and an expression of our values. the idea that corrupt companies should be propped up to benefit their employees sounds like it came straight from Target PR. That's why you shouldn't rely on a corrupt corporation for your livelihood. if they refused to support such a company, they would already have new jobs.
its time to pull the rug out from under them. God will provide.
Hmm, by now we're supposed to be sentimentally bonded to 'our' very own 'iconic American brands'??? And even be demoralized at their loss?
If so, how did such calculated emotional manipulation happen? Are people really expected to be driven by irrational (inculcated) loyalties that are actually -not at all- in our own best interests?
Just to look at the beer situation - their only response so far has been to repeatedly attempt to drive the mindless herd back into its corral emotionally, by guessing what surefire iconic imagery should work.
No soul searching, no attempt at self-awareness, understanding or true dialogue, no apology for attempting (by economic force) to socially engineer others into their own privately held ideological systems. To engineer thought, vs. respectfully persuade.
It was the predatory big box stores that -intentionally- came in and destroyed almost all local mom & pop stores in virtually every community. By evil design.
They diverted profits sustaining countless families and local economies, to a very narrow group of multinational profiteers; employed people who had to augment their poverty level pay with public assistance; and flooded America with tons of cheap products from China, etc. - oops, by the way 'accidentally' helping destroy our own manufacturing jobs.
This is far more a key part of the fascist globalist/monopolist strategy, vs. sentimentally 'American'. Other entities (like local chambers of commerce) have also been strategically captured, by bribes, blackmail or secret handshakes.
None of this seems 'of the people, by the people, and for the people'. It's far more like the revolutionary agenda of communism: to capture the means of production and distribution, and so re-create nations of people into a new herd of economic and political serfs.
The Clinton involvement with Walmart from the beginning, e.g., in retrospect raises questions of possible globalist agendas, and thus how much of people's loyalty such big box global businesses actually deserve.
100000%. Move back to local business. Build parallel everything.