Stanford study re:EV charging. So now they dont want us charging at home. Why should it be convenient!π Good luck with the infrastructure for that, California, (who can't even build a train)!π
(www.thebrighterside.news)
π€‘ CLIMATE CONTROL π€‘
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
This is very very bad for independence and autonomy. Not being able to charge you car at home is going to eventually mean being dependent on the whims of third parties. Just when you really need your car, for an evacuation for example, you won't be able to charge it.
I see all kinds of problems brewing from this, and 'control' being their solution to all of them.
A big hit to the convivence of charging at your own home. Why have solar panels if you have to send all power to the grid? lol solar/wind urban fools. I appreciate alternative energy when in rural areas or with poor power grids, but makes no sense for most city dwellers to have panels unless they are solar thermal to heat water.
Thatβs why they want you to have a smart thermostat in your house- they are going to be able to set your thermostat to avoid brown outs