Having breasts is no factor either.
Billions of women live their whole lives with no problems.
A lot of folk get toes and legs amputated due to diabetes and gangrene.
How about we chop off our legs to prevent that from happening?
Trannies would love for women to mutilate themselves.
Preventative mutilation is folly.
Medical necessity is another thing.
Did you take the shot also?
Ok, you're obviously not smart enough to understand that breast cancer starts in the breasts and can be somewhat predicted and that's why some women have their breasts removed to prevent it, while diabetes does not start in legs and removing legs does not prevent diabetes, so I guess we're done here.
Having legs doesn't cause diabetes.
Neither does having breasts cause cancer.
If you carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, having breasts is much more likely to cause cancer than not having them.
Having legs has no impact on getting diabetes, even if your legs might show symptoms if you do get it.
Having breasts is no factor either. Billions of women live their whole lives with no problems. A lot of folk get toes and legs amputated due to diabetes and gangrene. How about we chop off our legs to prevent that from happening? Trannies would love for women to mutilate themselves. Preventative mutilation is folly. Medical necessity is another thing. Did you take the shot also?
Ok, you're obviously not smart enough to understand that breast cancer starts in the breasts and can be somewhat predicted and that's why some women have their breasts removed to prevent it, while diabetes does not start in legs and removing legs does not prevent diabetes, so I guess we're done here.