I understand this argument but what about going on Bill o'Reilly show and saying he had the vaccine and that it was safe? If it had been the above explanation, he wouldn't have had to throw that out there. He didn't have to purposely promote it. Wondering what the explanation for this is.
Edit: no need to downvote. Just curious. I like trump but he's not perfect and wondering why he did this.
If you read the art of the deal or the art of war it makes sense.
It was going to be implemented world wide no matter, one man could not stop it.
Also I can imagine a huge amount of the lobbyists are pharma related. So if he didn't do what he did it would have been political suicide and then hence he would have left the battle field.
He did NOT throw it out there. He answered a direct question.
He'd already said, ad nauseum,, that only at risk people needed to consider the experimental jab which was part of Right to Try, a right that everyone had been cheering about.
He's also said, ad nauseam, that people should on?y make such a decision after doing their own, coercion free, research and making their own risk/benefit calculations.
When some people disagreed with HIS personal choice and booed, he said he was fine with people disagreeing with each other. Bottom line, it should be a decision left up to each person.
He also said repeatedly, that NO child or healthy young adult should be given the experimental vaccine since for them covid wasn't life threatening and therapeutics/therapies were available. He used his son Barrons bout with covid as an example.
The Blame Drumpf psyop is, for me, the most boring hoax so far. And the most evil because it malevolently exploits REAL pain.
I get it. I just remember an O'Reilly interview where they are both saying, very safe. They got it. You should too. I'll have to look it up. That doesn't fall in line with the rest of the narrative or fit in with your argument.
Also Ivanka was out promoting it. Showing her jab photo just like Newsom and Trudeau. She should be in the know because Trump loves her very much and he wouldn't let her get a dangerous shot. So that part doesn't make sense either because the point of those photos is to encourage others as well.
I understand this argument but what about going on Bill o'Reilly show and saying he had the vaccine and that it was safe? If it had been the above explanation, he wouldn't have had to throw that out there. He didn't have to purposely promote it. Wondering what the explanation for this is.
Edit: no need to downvote. Just curious. I like trump but he's not perfect and wondering why he did this.
If you read the art of the deal or the art of war it makes sense. It was going to be implemented world wide no matter, one man could not stop it. Also I can imagine a huge amount of the lobbyists are pharma related. So if he didn't do what he did it would have been political suicide and then hence he would have left the battle field.
He did NOT throw it out there. He answered a direct question.
He'd already said, ad nauseum,, that only at risk people needed to consider the experimental jab which was part of Right to Try, a right that everyone had been cheering about.
He's also said, ad nauseam, that people should on?y make such a decision after doing their own, coercion free, research and making their own risk/benefit calculations.
When some people disagreed with HIS personal choice and booed, he said he was fine with people disagreeing with each other. Bottom line, it should be a decision left up to each person.
He also said repeatedly, that NO child or healthy young adult should be given the experimental vaccine since for them covid wasn't life threatening and therapeutics/therapies were available. He used his son Barrons bout with covid as an example.
The Blame Drumpf psyop is, for me, the most boring hoax so far. And the most evil because it malevolently exploits REAL pain.
I get it. I just remember an O'Reilly interview where they are both saying, very safe. They got it. You should too. I'll have to look it up. That doesn't fall in line with the rest of the narrative or fit in with your argument.
Also Ivanka was out promoting it. Showing her jab photo just like Newsom and Trudeau. She should be in the know because Trump loves her very much and he wouldn't let her get a dangerous shot. So that part doesn't make sense either because the point of those photos is to encourage others as well.