Had they heard the appeal, the would have ruled against her. The supreme court in Canada is pro-authoritarian and anti-individual rights in Canada. It is just another branch or the authoritarian Canadian government.
Here is a video about how the Canadian Supreme court struck down an acquittal where self-defense was used as the defense and the government was able to get a conviction on the subsequent trial. Canada does not have double-jeopardy so the government can appeal acquittals and put people on trial again if they can get a favorable ruling in a higher court (which they often can as Canadian the courts are extremely corrupt, especially the supreme court).
Had they heard the appeal, the would have ruled against her. The supreme court in Canada is pro-authoritarian and anti-individual rights in Canada. It is just another branch or the authoritarian Canadian government.
Here is a video about how the Canadian Supreme court struck down an acquittal where self-defense was used as the defense and the government was able to get a conviction on the subsequent trial. Canada does not have double-jeopardy so the government can appeal acquittals and put people on trial again if they can get a favorable ruling in a higher court (which they often can as Canadian the courts are extremely corrupt, especially the supreme court).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDxpvr80KgQ
Them being agents of the crown corporation should make this no surprise.
B.A.R aka British Acredation Registry.