5
BananaBlizzard 5 points ago +5 / -0

NEW ARTICLE: VITAMIN D and CANCER - a quick review and a look at new research (4 papers reviewed)

With the recent explosion of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers in young people, there is an intense interest in cancer prevention and cancer treatment.

Vitamin D had a tremendous impact on the COVID-19 pandemic. It was attacked by Public Health Officials, who were more interested in driving up COVID-19 deaths, than preventing them.

What about Vitamin D and Cancer?

I review 4 recent papers that look at a large body of literature regarding Vitamin D and Cancer

Some highlights:

July 2023 (Seraphin et al) - The impact of vitamin D on cancer: A mini review

"Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to the development and progression of a number of cancer types"

"Vitamin D continues to show positive anti-cancer effects against many types of cancer."

"Recent epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies have revealed novel vitamin D-mediated biological mechanisms that regulate cancer cell self-renewal, differentiation, proliferation, transformation, and death"

Breast cancer - Vitamin D deficiency is very common in breast cancer patients, deficiency is linked to higher grade of breast cancer and ER- subtypes

Ovarian cancer - people with high Vitamin D levels had 37% lower risk of developing ovarian cancer

Glioblastoma - Vitamin D induced apoptosis, cytotoxic autophagy and inhibited migration and invasiveness, and cancer stemness

Colorectal cancer - Higher Vitamin D intake resulted in 17% lower risk of colorectal cancer, suppresses colorectal cancer stem cells

Prostate cancer - Vitamin D can inhibit tumor progression by negatively regulating androgen receptor signalling.

Melanoma - people on Vitamin D supplements had lower risk of melanoma, low Vitamin D levels associated with reduced melanoma patient survival

March 2023 - Nemeth et al - Interplay of Vitamin D and SIRT1 in Tissue-Specific Metabolism—Potential Roles in Prevention and Treatment of Non-Communicable Diseases Including Cancer

"Prospective and retrospective epidemiological studies reported an association between a 25(OH)D3 level below 20 ng/mL and a 30–50% increased risk of colon, prostate, and breast cancer and higher mortality"

I’m often asked by COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated individuals how to either prevent cancer from developing or once diagnosed, how to best treat a Turbo Cancer, given that Oncologists have no idea how to deal with this new vaccine induced phenomenon.

Ivermectin and Fenbendazole (or Mebendazole) have emerged as leading options for an alternative treatment approach to mRNA Induced Turbo Cancers, however, a comprehensive treatment plan will involve several other elements.

One of these is Vitamin D.

Supplementing Vitamin D is easy and cheap.

And it seems big pharma really doesn't want Vitamin D to get any traction in cancer prevention and cancer treatment.

However, there is substantial evidence to suggest that with daily Vitamin D supplementation you can achieve:

-> 10-30% decrease in the risk of getting certain cancers such as breast, ovarian, lung, colorectal, prostate, melanoma

-> 10-30% decrease in cancer mortality once diagnosed.

These are substantial benefits that should not be ignored.

1
BananaBlizzard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberals 2024 budget includes plan to increase “equity groups” in Canada As per the budget, the Liberals state their intention of “Building a better, more inclusive future for Two-Spirit, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, and additional sexually and gender diverse people (2SLGBTQI+).”

The Employment Equity Act currently lists women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities as those deserving of “special measures” by employers.

But the Liberals intend to expand this to include LGBT and Black Canadians to have their own special categories.

Their plan released Tuesday includes a commitment of investing nearly $150 million over 10 years to support “Canada’s first Federal 2SLGBTQI+ Action Plan,” part of which aims “to embed 2SLGBTQI+ issues in the work of the Government of Canada.”

The decision follows a massive report given to the Trudeau Liberals in December 2023 by an ‘equity task force’ that sought to make legislative changes to hiring practices.

Labour Minister Seamus O’Regan lauded the 500 page report given to him at the time, which included 187 policy recommendations.

Primarily an attack on merit-based hiring

Among the report’s countless recommendations, one reads that employers should be allowed to “correct” underrepresented groups among their staff.

The report further states that appointments based on merit should be “assessed by committees composed in consultation with the relevant Joint Employment Equity Committee.”

Knowing that the outcome of this mandate would likely lead to––indeed, has already led to––disingenuous identity claims, the task force put out an “urgent” call for some sort of verification process to combat the highly subjective “self-identify” option that employers currently give.

Another recommendation from the report is for employers to have to survey job-seekers about their sexual preferences during the hiring process — and for those hired, to ask about their sexual preferences every single year, as well as when they quit or get fired.

Yet another recommendation states that employers should be required to regularly report to a newly established Equity Commissioner — one who shall have legislative powers — on just how they are working to reduce barriers to employment for LGBT and Black job seekers.

1
BananaBlizzard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Billion dollar intercept system vs 10k system of attack. Financially it is a win for Iran. Iran was able to hit Israel soil.. If Iran decided to send 1000s, it appears Israel defences would be over whelmed. Video explains the situation.

3
BananaBlizzard 3 points ago +3 / -0

NEW ARTICLE: Propaganda Series - Dr.Michael Nehls and the Indoctrinated Mind - how COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines turned people into brainless zombies

Why are so many COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated acting like zombies, unable to break out of 4 years of brainwashing and propaganda?

Dr.Nehls, who has authored papers with Nobel prize winners and written a book called "The Indoctrinated Mind", provides one of the most compelling analyses of the "zombification" of the COVID-19 Vaccinated.

I was present at one of Dr.Nehls' presentations (at 2024 CPAC) and it was truly eye-opening. I go over Dr.Nehls' presentation in my article.

In short, the COVID-19 Vaccine spike protein attacks the hippocampus and blocks production of new neurons.

This loss of hippocampus neurons leads to:

  1. loss of mental energy to think (stuck in “zombie mode”, no critical thinking) - the vaccinated simply do what they’re told, either by politicians or their doctor;

  2. loss of natural curiosity - they vaccinated believe what they’re told - no questioning of “The Science”, vaccine injuries, sudden deaths, excess deaths, rise in cancers (Turbo Cancer), or any of the COVID Propaganda - no matter what new information arises, they don’t want to know or even ask questions;

  3. loss of psychological resilience (easily controlled through anxiety - perfect examples are those who still mask everywhere they go, or run to get their latest booster shot, test themselves 10+ times, carry CO2 monitors, jab their kids);

  4. loss of individuality, low self esteem - the desperate need to be part of the “socially acceptable majority”, the CNN & MSNBC watchers, Biden & Trudeau voters, etc. These were the people who heaped abuse on the unvaccinated when they were told to, called them “selfish”, these are the people who “did their part” for society.

These were the people who posted photos of their vaccine cards, or created digital badges on facebook of being vaccinated - this is how we are now able to identify them when they die suddenly. It wasn't just virtue signaling, there is a neurological explanation for their desperate need to "belong".

There are 2 other factors:

  1. social isolation and fear-mongering can ALSO lead to neuronal loss in the hippocampus

  2. by blocking neuron production in the hippocampus, you end up "over-writing" existing neurons which means loss of your memories, loss of your individuality, loss of WHO YOU WERE.

Ultimately this attack on the COVID-19 Vaccinated brain leads to: “Acceptance of objectively harmful measures”

While the literature is full of studies on patients who had SEVERE COVID-19 and now suffer from "structural changes in the hippocampus" or "loss of hippocampal neurogenesis", these studies never take into account COVID-19 Vaccine status or correct for it.

The deliberate attack on the hippocampus is a fascinating potential explanation of why the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated are so difficult to wake up, why they don't question anything, and why they continue to do as they're told and mask and inject themselves like zombies.

Those who continue to mask and inject themselves with COVID-19 boosters aren't just "brainwashed" or "they can't break free from Propaganda" - they have suffered actual brain damage, brain damage that could potentially be treated and reversed.

13
BananaBlizzard 13 points ago +13 / -0

NEW ARTICLE: FENBENDAZOLE and CANCER Part 2 - Treating Turbo Cancer - 10 new studies released in 2023-2024 (also Mebendazole) - suggested PROTOCOLS for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers

Last year, in October, I wrote one of the most popular articles on FENBENDAZOLE and Cancer Treatment ever published, which went viral Internationally, with millions of views.

Joe Rogan @joerogan read my article on his podcast!

After the article, I was flooded with 1000s of questions, not about mechanisms of Fenbendazole action against cancer, but about protocols, doses, formulations.

How do you use Fenbendazole for Cancer?

What is Mebendazole? (the expensive, FDA Approved version of Fenbendazole)

This article is the practical approach that addresses all of those questions.

First, I give you 10 peer reviewed studies published since my last article (2023-2024) that look at repurposing Fenbendazole, Mebendazole, Albendazole and Parbendazole for cancer.

We get it. This family of anti-parasitic drugs called "Benzimidazoles" are fantastic for cancer and big pharma is rushing to repurpose these drugs for particularly aggressive cancers like colon cancers or brain cancers.

But they're focusing not on Fenbendazole but on the others. WHY? Follow the money.

Fenbendazole is dirt cheap. Mebendazole (Enverm) has skyrocketed to over $400 per dose Albendazole (Albenza) has skyrocketed to over $190 per dose

I want to highlight one of these 10 new peer reviewed studies that prove Fenbendazole (and its more expensive variants) works against cancer, because there is an additional KEY element there.

(2023 Jun, Mukherjee et al) - Ketogenic diet as a metabolic vehicle for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of mebendazole and devimistat in preclinical pediatric glioma

“This study investigated the influence of nutritional ketosis on the therapeutic action of mebendazole (MBZ) and devimistat (CPI-613) against the highly invasive VM-M3 glioblastoma cells in juvenile syngeneic p20-p25 mice”

“maximum therapeutic benefit of mebendazole and CPI-613 on tumour invasion and mouse survival occurred only when the drugs were administered together with a ketogenic diet (KD)

Let me repeat that once again:

"Maximum benefit of mebendazole against cancer occurred only when it was administered with a KETOGENIC DIET".

You must starve cancer cells of glucose.

Now let's get to DOSING:

I propose the following FENBENDAZOLE DOSING:

LOW DOSE (222mg/day) (3 days on, 4 days off)

  • Cancers in remission
  • Strong family history, genetic predisposition
  • prophylaxis
  • Original Joe Tippens Protocol (with Curcumin 600mg/day, CBD Oil 25mg/day, Vitamin E 800 IU/day)

MEDIUM DOSE (222mg/day, 6 days a week)

  • Starting dose for most non-mRNA induced tumors
  • weight < 200lb

HIGH DOSE (444mg/day, 6 days a week)

  • Most COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Turbo Cancers
  • Aggressive Cancers
  • Stage 4
  • Weight 200+ lb

VERY HIGH DOSE (888mg/day or 1000mg/day, 6 days a week)

  • Extensive metastatic disease
  • Extremely poor prognosis

Highest dosing I’ve seen is 30-50mg/kg/day for 5 days, based on the “Merck Manual”, however there is no evidence in the literature for this high dose. Still, a few claim to have taken this dose without side effects.

Fenbendazole can elevate liver function tests, so it would be a good idea to have a family doctor monitor those with regular blood work.

WHAT ABOUT MEBENDAZOLE?

This is the FDA Approved (for humans), more expensive version of Fenbendazole that big pharma likes better

This is going to be a significantly more expensive option and may be out of reach for some people.

No one talks about dosing of Mebendazole for Cancer, however, published literature suggests this:

LOW DOSE (100mg/day)

  • Cancers in remission
  • Strong family history, genetic predisposition
  • prophylaxis

MEDIUM DOSE (200mg/day)

  • Starting dose for non-mRNA cancers
  • Several studies in humans have used this dose successfully for metastatic disease but disease eventually progresses, so it doesn't seem to be strong enough dose

HIGH DOSE (500mg-1500mg/day)

  • There is a Clinical trial for brain cancer that is using this dose regimen
  • mRNA Turbo Cancer cases should probably start here
  • Aggressive cancers
  • Stage 4 disease

VERY HIGH DOSE (4g/day)

  • safety established in 2021 study by Mansoori et al in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial for Gastrointestinal Cancer
  • right now, there is no regimen in the literature with a higher dose than this

COMBINATION WITH IVERMECTIN:

If I was diagnosed with mRNA Induced Turbo Cancer, I would strongly consider a Combination Protocol with starting doses of Ivermectin (1mg/kg/day) and Fenbendazole (444mg/day)

Thought Experiment:

Imagine you are a Canadian doctor, with 8 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines because you listened to Dr.Theresa Tam @CPHO_Canada and the Canadian Medical Association @CMA_Docs , and because of their incompetence and malice, you've just been diagnosed with a Stage 4 Colon Cancer with metastatic disease in the liver, lungs and bones. You probably have 2-3 months to live, or less. You are going to want to look at a COMBINATION PROTOCOL with the highest doses of Ivermectin (2mg/kg/day) and Fenbendazole (888mg/day or 1000mg/day) you can tolerate and have your doctor monitor your liver and kidney function tests.

My goal with these articles, is to provide as much clear information as possible for someone dealing with cancer or mRNA Induced Turbo Cancer.

This article deals with the practical approach to using Febendazole or Mebendazole with a reasonable dosing schedule or approach to figuring out what dose to try.

It is important to arm yourself with medical knowledge that cancer doctors (Oncologists) will simply not give you, because they either don’t know it, or they won’t risk their careers to save you.

If you care at all about cancer, you don't want to miss this ground-breaking article! Big pharma is really going to hate this one (I expect 100s of bots to swarm my account within 24 hours)

And if anyone can get me on Joe Rogan's Podcast, so I can help him pronounce "FENBENDAZOLE" properly, as well as other medical terms that he struggled with, I'd really appreciate it!

15
BananaBlizzard 15 points ago +15 / -0

Trump one liner…MSM less popular than Congress

18
BananaBlizzard 18 points ago +19 / -1

Dr Makis lists 4 "Experimental Protocols" for using IVERMECTIN with CANCER The "Dr.Makis Ivermectin Cancer Protocols"

NEW ARTICLE: IVERMECTIN and CANCER Part 2 - Treating Turbo Cancer - 7 new studies released in 2024 show Ivermectin works against CANCER - suggested PROTOCOLS for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers

Last year, in October, I wrote one of the most popular articles on Ivermectin (IVM) and Cancer Treatment ever published, which went viral Internationally, with millions of views.

After the article, I was flooded with 1000s of questions, not about mechanisms of IVM action against cancer, but about protocols, doses, formulations - which Ivermectin to use and how to use it, what are the doses, for how long, etc.

This article is the practical approach that addresses all of those questions.

There are 3 types of Ivermectin formulations on the market:

  • pills or tablets in 3mg, 6mg or 12mg
  • liquid form, usually 1mL per 10mg of IVM
  • paste form, usually 6.4g per 120mg of IVM

(always check the dosages when not using pill form)

I propose 4 "Experimental Protocols" for using IVERMECTIN with CANCER (especially in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccinated Individuals who have developed TURBO CANCER):

The "Dr.Makis Ivermectin Cancer Protocols"

LOW DOSE (<=0.5mg/kg)

  • Cancers in remission
  • Strong family history
  • genetic predisposition
  • prophylactic use

MEDIUM DOSE (1.0mg/kg)

  • Starting dose for most Cancers, including mRNA Vaccine Induced Turbo Cancers (lymphoma, breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, testicular/cervical/ovarian, kidney, etc)

HIGH DOSE (2.0mg/kg)

  • Starting dose for aggressive Turbo Cancers, especially Leukemias, pancreatic, brain cancer
  • aggressiveness of a tumor is often determined on pathology (Ki67 staining of 80%+ for example)
  • some very aggressive rare types (appendix, gallbladder, cholangiocarcinoma, angiosarcoma & other sarcomas)

VERY HIGH DOSE (2.5mg/kg)

  • Very desperate situations
  • have only days to live
  • extreme tumor metastases burden
  • extremely poor prognosis
  • certain aggressive or very large brain tumors?

Let's run a thought experiment: A 30 year old teacher (60kg) took 4 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and has just been diagnosed with Stage 4 Turbo Colon Cancer with a few liver metastases (very common scenario after Pfizer or Moderna).

This person considers a MEDIUM DOSE 1mg/kg/day IVERMECTIN regimen (in addition to standard chemo/rad) which is 60mg of IVM a day

That would be five 12mg pills a day OR 6 mL of IVM liquid (10mg/1mL) a day

The liquid version is much cheaper and could be as cheap as $1 per day. The cost of pills varies widely and could be anywhere from $10 to $50 a day, depending on where you import them from.

Let's run another thought experiment: A 25 year old who took 3 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines and has a strong family history of cancer, is very worried about developing Turbo Cancer.

This person wants to take a low dose Ivermectin regimen as prophylaxis. She takes 12mg a day. She understands that currently there are no human trials looking at Ivermectin as prophylaxis against developing cancer.

Let's run another thought experiment: A 45 year old Canadian doctor has taken 8 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines, has been diagnosed with a baseball sized Grade 4 brain tumor (glioblastoma) and has been given weeks to live. He decides to take 2.5mg/kg/day and develops some visual symptoms that go away after a few days. The tumor starts to shrink in size over the course of several weeks and his Canadian doctor colleagues are baffled.

For brain cancers in particular, the issue is getting sufficient IVM across the blood brain barrier to have an impact on brain tumors. So a higher dose is necessary.

2
BananaBlizzard 2 points ago +3 / -1

His discussion can get very deep at times, however he backs up with evidence. He will get you thinking. He gives a lot of info. From colors, the Simpsons, Caprisun, Crowley, sex magic, rocket programs, Dona Cat, Taylor Swift, Beyoncé, chemical rituals, tria prima, April 19th day (he makes a prediction, interesting date?), cern machines, apep, Havana syndrome, the keystone (cancer), the number 69, “eyes”, etc . Very interesting. A must watch…Wild stuff. So much info.

10
BananaBlizzard 10 points ago +10 / -0

https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-vaccinated-children-vs-unvaccinated?r=1piqi8

Dr. Paul Thomas Hires Outside Firm to Track Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated Kids

2,700 variably Vaccinated and 560 not Vaccinated. Then they were Age Matched and Compared.

Here are the Findings:

  1. Asthma and Allergies Significantly increased in the Vaccinated. Off the Chart difference.

  2. Eczema significantly was higher.

  3. Sinusitis was significantly higher.

  4. Gastroenteritis was significantly higher.

  5. Respiratory Infections significantly higher. 6. Otitis Media - Middle Ear Infection was significantly higher.

  6. Conjunctivitis - Eye Infections significantly higher.

  7. Breathing issues significantly higher.

  8. Behavioral issues significantly higher.

  9. ADHD -- NONE in the Unvaccinated at all for 10 years in Dr. Thomas' practice.

As you see on the chart it is incredibly high which shows that there is something in these vaccines (Toxic Heavy Metals) that is causing ADHD.

The results were not even remotely close in comparison. It is a total knockout. If you listened to the TV Media you would think that results would be just the opposite of these findings.

There is a reason in 100 years of Vaccinating Children there has NEVER been retrospective studies.

Don’t you want to see 5, 10, 15 or even 20 year studies of the vaxxed vs unvaxxed? Wouldn’t that be VERY Helpful? Why has there never been any studies like this?

They would 100% PROVE without Shadow of a Doubt that not only do Vaccines NOT prevent infections and transmission but they are severely harming children – especially for Allergies, Middle Ear Infections, Autism, Breathing issues, Sinusitis, Respiratory Infections, Eye Infections, Gastroenteritis, Eczema and Behavioral issues.

IF Vaccines PREVENT Infections then why are infections Significantly Higher in all of Dr. Thomas' vaccinated children? These are serious life changing chronic conditions.

Vaccines shift the immune system to Allergy and Autoimmunity, and you have more and more infections of other kinds. In short, what does this mean? It means that Vaxcines DESTROY a Child’s Immune System, every vax is different with different live viruses and toxins and they will really hit a child with a weaker immune systems first.

Source: Jessica Rojas

3
BananaBlizzard 3 points ago +3 / -0

According to Freeland, the annual cost of birth control in Canada ranges from $300 for pills to $500 for an IUD. “That’s not cheap,” she says, and that’s why every Canadian should be forced to flip the bill for some women’s choices.

How much will Freeland’s plan cost?

Freeland says that, while the plan hasn’t been finalized, the goal is to provide free birth control to approximately 9 million Canadian women.

At $300 a head, according to Freeland’s own number, that means Canadians will be forced to pay out a collective $2.7 billion every single year at least—and that’s before administrative and distribution costs.

2
BananaBlizzard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lots of info in this video. He yaps for a bit then he gives a lot of excellent information…leave the world behind, white lion, Singapore, deep state magazine telling us what they plan, Super Bowl, new Ghostbuster, bridge symbolism, keystone, weather 47 degrees, etc. crazy wild! Lots of 128! He gets a guest speaker on too. Wild stuff.

3
BananaBlizzard 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/arnold-schwarzenegger-recovering-surgery-pacemaker-1235859667/

“First of all, I want you to know I’m doing great! I had my surgery on Monday, and by Friday, I was already at a big environmental event with my friend and fellow fitness crusader Jane Fonda,” he continued, praising Fonda as someone who is “healthy” and “looks fantastic.”

“Nobody would ever have thought I started the week with a surgery. I want to thank my whole team at the Cleveland Clinic. All of the doctors and nurses took amazing care of me and made the surgery as painless as possible,” he added.

The surgery was prompted by some scar tissue from Schwarzenegger’s previous procedures, he said, which made his heartbeat irregular and he went to get a full check-up every year. “That’s life with a genetic heart issue. But you won’t hear me complaining,” he said.

Schwarzenegger credited his being “diligent and staying in touch with my doctors and listening to them” for him being in the healthy condition he’s in today. He then shared that his mom did not get the valve replacement surgery and died in 1998.

“I had my valves replaced for the first time in 1997, which required open heart surgery. They told me both valves would last 12 to 15 years,” he reflected. He then went in for surgery to get both replaced again in 2018 and 2020. After his surgeries, he said he would check in “all of the time” with his doctors to share his heart rate information from home and that they would advise when a pacemaker was needed.

After going in for a normal checkup at the beginning of March when headed to the Arnold Sports Festival, Schwarzenegger said doctors did “a full series of tests” to monitor his heart. He said that “all the extra work your heart does” from having an irregular heartbeat “wears you out.” He added, “If could be honest with you I struggled with those 16-hour days at the Arnold Sports Festival.”

view more: Next ›