Conspiracy no more - "PizzaGate" has now been proven by an official, mainstream investigative research team with an article published 6/7/23 in the Wall Street Journal...
Of all places, the Wall Street Journal published an article on 6/7/23 that VALIDATED "PizzaGate" as being very real, and I quote from this article: NOT some crazy "Q-kook conspiracy theory." Love it! :-)
WSJ partnered with researchers at Stanford & University of Mass. Amhert to investigate "PizzaGate" - here's the 6-7-23 WSJ article: https://archive.is/2023.06.07-110733/https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/instagram-vast-pedophile-network-4ab7189.
This WSJ article discusses how prolific Instagram (owned by Meta/Facebook) is in child sex trafficking networks, using "cheese pizza" related terms as code words for pedos who are seeking out kids to abuse and/or child porn content. If you can't access the article due to pay-wall, I've pasted the full content (less the images from the article) at the bottom of this post.
Here's an article by The Verge regarding Instagram's involvement in promoting pedo networks on its platform entitled "Instagram’s recommendation algorithms promote pedophile networks": https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/7/23752192/instagrams-recommendation-algorithms-promote-pedophile-networks-investigation
Here's another article on it from Revolver: https://www.revolver.news/2023/06/wsj-uncovers-pizzagate-pedophile-network/
Recap of "PizzaGate" & Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking network (for those who may be new to The Great Awakening or would like to review a little summary)...
As a starting point, here's numerous "Q" posts about Jeffrey Epstein: https://operationq.pub/?q=Epstein
Here's a "Q" post talking about the "temple" building (allegedly used for Satanic Ritual Abuse & pedo crimes) on Jeffrey Epstein's island: https://operationq.pub/?q=%23%233050
This post also has some info in there on Les Wexner. Wexner is the founder of Victoria's Secret who's seemingly neck deep in the whole Epstein underage sex trafficking ring too. Wexner is allegedly who financed Epstein's trafficking/ honeypot/ blackmail operations in the first place too.
There's a screenshot of numerous security cameras from what looks like some kind of underground torture(?) rooms at a nightclub in NYC called Le Baron. This photo (along with several others) was posted 7-19-2013 on Instagram by Rachel "Ray" Chandler (one of Epstein's child sex slave 'procurers'). That pic was part of a larger group of photos that Chandler posted about that club - screenshot here: https://take-me-to.space/ojJe4AT.jpeg
Rachel Chandler's security monitors photo was posted by Q in drop #3147 on 3-20-2019 at: https://operationq.pub/?q=%23%233147
"Q" made 19 posts about this Epstein child trafficker Rachel "Ray" Chandler (at least that are find-able by searching "Chandler") - see: https://operationq.pub/?q=chandler
Note - there's also a pic in this group of Rachel Chandler cozied up to Pres. Bill Clinton on Epstein's "Lolita Express" plane in that assortment of Q posts too.
The lady in the white shirt on "Channel 11" of the security camera monitors is quite possibly Nancy Pelosi. Here's a pic of what Pelosi looked like (her hairstyle) in 2013 - taken at the San Francisco "Gay Pride Parade" (no surprise there): https://wwwflickr.com/photos/princebart/9177091725/
There's a lot more to this security monitors photo (especially on "Channel 10") than can be gleaned from this grainy pic. There were some Anon researchers (at the time) who cleaned up these various security camera images and uncovered some really gruesome activities that were being filmed there. Horrifying shit you can't un-see once the photo is less fuzzy/grainy and sharpened up.
Channel 10 in the pic (allegedly) shows a bunch of mostly naked children sitting on top of buckets (because they've been ass-raped so much they can't hold their bowels closed??) and there's (allegedly) a dead body laying on their 'dining' table. What's for dinner - a dead guy? Fucking horrific!
More players involved with Jeffrey Epstein...
We've all heard about notorious Ghislaine Maxwell, but there are some lesser-known players involved with Epstein, such as....
International modeling agency owner Jean-Luc Brunel, who typically recruited teen girls as "models" - then they'd turn the tables on the girls and convert them into sex slaves, similar to Maxwell's method. But it seems many of them were getting paid (at least some of the time or in the beginning) and they didn't appear to be actually kidnapped (at least based on reported cases and victim testimony/court case transcripts that have been made public). Maxwell and Brunel were obviously masters of manipulation and coercion.
Jean-Luc Brunel had multiple "front" international modeling agencies (financed by Epstein) and he'd bring foreign under-aged people into the US from other countries (who couldn't even speak English, so they'd be at an even bigger disadvantage), house them in apartments (in groups - practically stacked on top of one another) and then trap them here. Both Brunel and Maxwell were also notorious for taking their sex slaves' passports so they couldn't get out of the country too.
Brunel was arrested in 2020 and was "Epsteined" (killed in prison) in 2022 - supposedly. https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2022/02/jeffrey-epstein-associate-jean-luc-brunel-found-dead-in-prison NOTE: If you can't access this article, I've pasted its full content (less the photos) at the bottom of this post.
Take-aways from what Anon researchers have gathered collectively, Rachel "Ray" Chandler (even the name "Chandler" is an alleged pseudonym for "child handler") lured kids into this evil web under the guise of having a "modeling agency" (like Jean-Luc Brunel), but you can tell from the photos of Chandler's "models" (see the "Q" posts that show Chandler's "up and coming models" pics) that these victims were more likely kidnapped, beaten and/or heavily drugged, plus there were victims who could have been used in Satanic Ritual Abuse and/or killed too.
Of all the Epstein child procurer minions that we know about, it seems to me that Rachel "Ray" Chandler may actually be worse than Ghislaine Maxwell / Jean-Luc Brunel / Les Wexner. From what I'd researched/discovered at the time when Q started dropping this intel, Ghislaine typically recruited teen girls (from broken homes, often with drug-addicted parent(s), often in poor/trailer park neighborhoods) to become "masseuses" or "personal assistants" for Epstein and also paid them to recruit other teens in similar ways (turning many of them into pimps/madams).
Here's one of Chandler's topless male "models" from her "talent agency" who looks to me like he's got cigarette burn scars all over him - she posted this pic on her Instagram: https://operationq.pub/media/ef3fc41bc4ee2ae0c83e0a08a600b96c98cdd5a4cd06c0244869f16a99d84d5d.png (read the comments)
And Rachel/Ray Chandler's child sex trafficking victims seem more likely to be younger than most of what Epstein's other procurers brought in. See these scantily clad children (looking closer to 10-12 years old) from Chandler's Instagram/Tumblr posts: https://operationq.pub/?q=%23%233144 &
https://rachelchandler.tumblr.com/page/3 (NOTE: Rachel Chandler's boyfriend just so happened to be a photographer - who apparently took "modeling" photos of the trafficked kids)
Here's a bunch of "Q" posts re: Rachel "Ray" Chandler: https://operationq.pub/?q=chandler
"Q" said that Rachel/Ray Chandler was "Allison Mack x 100." If you aren't aware of who Allison Mack is. She was an actress who starred in "Smallville" and she was a procurer for the NXIVM sex cult. NXIVM was led by Keith Raniere (financially backed by the untouchable/elite Bronfman family) where they literally branded girls (in their pubic region) with the initials "KR", marking them as Raniere's personal sex slaves.
Allison Mack got a piddly 3-year jail sentence after getting a plea deal: https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/30/us/allison-mack-sentencing/index.html. Thankfully, the kingpin sicko - Keith Raniere - got 120 years in prison for his evil actions.
2 of 2... WSJ article cont'd:
The pedophilic accounts on Instagram mix brazenness with superficial efforts to veil their activity, researchers found. Certain emojis function as a kind of code, such as an image of a map—shorthand for “minor-attracted person”—or one of “cheese pizza,” which shares its initials with “child pornography,” according to Levine of UMass. Many declare themselves “lovers of the little things in life.”
Accounts identify themselves as “seller” or “s3ller,” and many state their preferred form of payment in their bios. These seller accounts often convey the child’s purported age by saying they are “on chapter 14,” or “age 31” followed by an emoji of a reverse arrow.
Some of the accounts bore indications of sex trafficking, said Levine of UMass, such as one displaying a teenager with the word WHORE scrawled across her face.
Some users claiming to sell self-produced sex content say they are “faceless”—offering images only from the neck down—because of past experiences in which customers have stalked or blackmailed them. Others take the risk, charging a premium for images and videos that could reveal their identity by showing their face.
Many of the accounts show users with cutting scars on the inside of their arms or thighs, and a number of them cite past sexual abuse.
Even glancing contact with an account in Instagram’s pedophile community can trigger the platform to begin recommending that users join it.
Sarah Adams, a Canadian mother of two, has built an Instagram audience discussing child exploitation and the dangers of oversharing on social media. Given her focus, Adams’ followers sometimes send her disturbing things they’ve encountered on the platform. In February, she said, one messaged her with an account branded with the term “incest toddlers.”
Adams said she accessed the account—a collection of pro-incest memes with more than 10,000 followers—for only the few seconds that it took to report to Instagram, then tried to forget about it. But over the course of the next few days, she began hearing from horrified parents. When they looked at Adams’ Instagram profile, she said they were being recommended “incest toddlers” as a result of Adams’ contact with the account.
A Meta spokesman said that “incest toddlers” violated its rules and that Instagram had erred on enforcement. The company said it plans to address such inappropriate recommendations as part of its newly formed child safety task force.
As with most social-media platforms, the core of Instagram’s recommendations are based on behavioral patterns, not by matching a user’s interests to specific subjects. This approach is efficient in increasing the relevance of recommendations, and it works most reliably for communities that share a narrow set of interests.
In theory, this same tightness of the pedophile community on Instagram should make it easier for Instagram to map out the network and take steps to combat it. Documents previously reviewed by the Journal show that Meta has done this sort of work in the past to suppress account networks it deems harmful, such as with accounts promoting election delegitimization in the U.S. after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.
Like other platforms, Instagram says it enlists its users to help detect accounts that are breaking rules. But those efforts haven’t always been effective.
Sometimes user reports of nudity involving a child went unanswered for months, according to a review of scores of reports filed over the last year by numerous child-safety advocates.
Earlier this year, an anti-pedophile activist discovered an Instagram account claiming to belong to a girl selling underage-sex content, including a post declaring, “This teen is ready for you pervs.” When the activist reported the account, Instagram responded with an automated message saying: “Because of the high volume of reports we receive, our team hasn’t been able to review this post.”
After the same activist reported another post, this one of a scantily clad young girl with a graphically sexual caption, Instagram responded, “Our review team has found that [the account’s] post does not go against our Community Guidelines.” The response suggested that the user hide the account to avoid seeing its content.
A Meta spokesman acknowledged that Meta had received the reports and failed to act on them. A review of how the company handled reports of child sex abuse found that a software glitch was preventing a substantial portion of user reports from being processed, and that the company’s moderation staff wasn’t properly enforcing the platform’s rules, the spokesman said. The company said it has since fixed the bug in its reporting system and is providing new training to its content moderators.
Even when Instagram does take down accounts selling underage-sex content, they don’t always stay gone. Under the platform’s internal guidelines, penalties for violating its community standards are generally levied on accounts, not users or devices. Because Instagram allows users to run multiple linked accounts, the system makes it easy to evade meaningful enforcement. Users regularly list the handles of “backup” accounts in their bios, allowing them to simply resume posting to the same set of followers if Instagram removes them.
In some instances, Instagram’s recommendations systems directly undercut efforts by its own safety staff. After the company decided to crack down on links from a specific encrypted file transfer service notorious for transmitting child sex content, Instagram blocked searches for its name.
Instagram’s AI-driven hashtag suggestions didn’t get the message. Despite refusing to show results for the service’s name, the platform’s autofill feature recommended that users try variations on the name with the words “boys” and “CP” added to the end.
The company tried to disable those hashtags amid its response to the queries by the Journal. But within a few days Instagram was again recommending new variations of the service’s name that also led to accounts selling purported underage-sex content.
Following the company’s initial sweep of accounts brought to its attention by Stanford and the Journal, UMass’s Levine checked in on some of the remaining underage seller accounts on Instagram. As before, viewing even one of them led Instagram to recommend new ones. Instagram’s suggestions were helping to rebuild the network that the platform’s own safety staff was in the middle of trying to dismantle.
A Meta spokesman said its systems to prevent such recommendations are currently being built. Levine called Instagram’s role in promoting pedophilic content and accounts unacceptable.
“Pull the emergency brake,” he said. “Are the economic benefits worth the harms to these children?”
Write to Jeff Horwitz at [email protected] and Katherine Blunt at [email protected]