Rolling Stone/ADL hit-piece on PW yesterday. The focus? Angry calls to violence and other "J6-style rhetoric." Their hit piece on GAW? Something about The Beatles. Pathetic, they had nothing on us! This is why we mod GAW the way we do. PW tolerates retard fuckwits. WE DON'T!
(archive.today)
FIFTH GEN WARFARE
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (123)
sorted by:
I think the article is counterproductive for Rolling Stone because it shows they don’t get obvious jokes. Here’s a quote:
(btw, Heavy_Metal_Patriot seems familiar)
Does the Rolling Stone writer really believe that HMP is in contact with a 100 year old German WWII vet named Hans who held on to his 80 year old flame thrower that he’s now willing to lend out to Americans? I don’t think anyone honestly believes that.
Also the article assumes that public executions are necessarily extralegal. They’re not. They’re usually sentenced by a court of law. If the executions aren’t legal, the executioners wouldn’t want them to be public. Convicting people of treason and then executing them for it is not lynching. People who advocate for execution of traitors are not necessarily saying that they’d do the deed themselves as vigilantes.
Some of the quotes did veer towards vigilantism and extralegal belligerence, so this GAW post is correct that content like that is foolish. Still, much of that type of content shouldn’t be taken literally, because it’s clearly meant to be edgy jokes and not real suggestions:
Damn right came here to say the same. Not all of what they said on pw is wrong. Let's not get off track here. Executions are a legal avenue for traitors and what we want.