Anyone got pics of the actual tanker that we're being told collapsed this thing?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Cement fatigue refers to the phenomenon where repeated stress cycles over time can cause structural degradation and eventual failure in cement-based materials. The specific temperature at which cement fatigue can occur depends on various factors, including the type of cement, its composition, and the environmental conditions.
In general, cement-based materials exhibit reduced strength and durability at elevated temperatures. As the temperature increases, the chemical reactions within the cement matrix can be accelerated, leading to accelerated deterioration. Additionally, the thermal expansion and contraction of the materials can create internal stresses, which, when combined with cyclic loading, can contribute to fatigue failure.
The exact temperature at which cement fatigue occurs can vary. However, it is widely recognized that prolonged exposure to high temperatures, typically above 500 degrees Celsius (932 degrees Fahrenheit), can significantly impact the strength and performance of cement-based materials. At such temperatures, the hydration process of cement is affected, resulting in the loss of structural integrity.
It's important to note that the specific temperature limits for cement fatigue can also depend on the application and intended use of the cement-based structure. For instance, certain specialized cement mixtures, such as refractory cements, are designed to withstand higher temperatures and may have different fatigue characteristics compared to standard cement.
To ensure the longevity and safety of cement-based structures, it is crucial to consider the expected operating temperatures and environmental conditions during the design and construction phases. Engineering practices and materials selection should account for the potential fatigue effects and incorporate appropriate measures to mitigate the risk of failure.
What about the steel girders?
They are all plated or welded together to spread the load from the road bed.
Are you suggesting that the steel reinforced concrete pillars failed, which would have been some distance from the truck?.
Hey stop with the logic it’s not helping 😎
https://www.fox29.com/news/was-i-95-collapse-preventable-engineering-expert-explains-how-the-disaster-happened
This bridge did in fact have steel reinforced concrete girders.
Basically, if you believe fire took this thing down you must also believe the fuel from a Boeing 767 took down the World Trade Center.
Clown World and it’s not even noon yet.
Exactly. My implied point.
It now seems obvious to me that the fuel melting steel was a big part of this psyop.
Philly might have been chosen due to the thick blue nature of that area and their disdain for all things “truther”.
I’m betting there are A LOT of folks in that area that are having to talk about this everyday bc their asses are being directly effected by the fubar traffic this is causing.
Sure,,, but where’s the tanker?
the fire was directly under the overpass. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FagbvD1cHg
Here is a pic of the “”other side”” of the bridge.
https://whyy.org/articles/interstate-95-collapse-i-95-fire-philly-overpass-tanker/
Where’s the truck?
I’m seriously enjoying this.
...exactly...
Average width of an interstate highway lane is 12’, there were four lanes on the side that collapsed.
An average 18 wheeler with haul is 70’. Do you see the problem here?
...the cab could be concealed under the other side of the overpass....
...you did not account for the shoulders or side barriers...