you've stated your position... just looking for some substantial evidence. the evidence presented for the planes is all very sketchy at best. a handful of eyewitnesses, a handful of tapes released well after the fact, and... oh yeah, a passport, rofl
the collapse was clearly a controlled demolition that had nothing to do with any planes. the planes transponders showed them lingering suspiciously at other airports, leading some to believe they actually landed there.
no personal videos of the event were released until many hours after... ...and those videos have been shown to be manipulated. the evidence is strong enough for demolition and against planes that I personally don't believe the proof you're looking for exists. it will definitely take more than a remastered video of a guy glancing upwards.
i guess we're on the same page about there being a fireman there at all before the impact of the first plane. a bit odd, but i suppose its more of those "drills" that always seem to turn disastrous
Nah, the fireman was CGI, It was the plane that was real but it was a only a Pilatus Porter (a light turboprop), loaded with a battlefield nuke and the image of the plane was up scaled by refractive post possessing, a technology available at the time.
This is the plane that hit the world trade centre and by this I mean THIS very plane 6 times.
It was duplicated through timeline transmogrification and loaded with a battlefield nuke and flown inverted into not one but both towers 3 times each but edited out later to make look like a flock seagulls and a suicidal investment banker !
It's so much deeper than you think.
Edit:- Sorry, it got boring and I thought I should at least get a laugh.
There were planes and Bin Laden was CYA.
.....and they blew up building 7.
you've stated your position... just looking for some substantial evidence. the evidence presented for the planes is all very sketchy at best. a handful of eyewitnesses, a handful of tapes released well after the fact, and... oh yeah, a passport, rofl
Just pointing out that I am onboard with the rest of it, just not the CGI airplanes or shaped charges on every load-bearing member of both towers.
a passport...... 3 missing planes, 221 dead people.
Video of it from asshole to breakfast time.
What constitutes substantial evidence 22 years later?
the collapse was clearly a controlled demolition that had nothing to do with any planes. the planes transponders showed them lingering suspiciously at other airports, leading some to believe they actually landed there.
no personal videos of the event were released until many hours after... ...and those videos have been shown to be manipulated. the evidence is strong enough for demolition and against planes that I personally don't believe the proof you're looking for exists. it will definitely take more than a remastered video of a guy glancing upwards.
i guess we're on the same page about there being a fireman there at all before the impact of the first plane. a bit odd, but i suppose its more of those "drills" that always seem to turn disastrous
Nah, the fireman was CGI, It was the plane that was real but it was a only a Pilatus Porter (a light turboprop), loaded with a battlefield nuke and the image of the plane was up scaled by refractive post possessing, a technology available at the time.
This is the plane that hit the world trade centre and by this I mean THIS very plane 6 times.
It was duplicated through timeline transmogrification and loaded with a battlefield nuke and flown inverted into not one but both towers 3 times each but edited out later to make look like a flock seagulls and a suicidal investment banker !
It's so much deeper than you think.
Edit:- Sorry, it got boring and I thought I should at least get a laugh.