To answer your question (I shouldn't need to do this because it's obvious)...men are different (not better...different) than women. The fact that men cannot have children doesn't make women better as individuals...but they are definitely better than men (better equipped) to have children. The same exact logic can be applied to women doing a traditionally "man's job." Men are better and safer at certain things than women are because of their size, bone structure and muscle mass. If women can pass the same endurance test(s) that a man can pass in applying for say...to be a firefighter, police officer or soldier, then more power to them...however, this is not the case...the tests have been altered to make them more in tune with a female's strength...in other words, most women cannot pass the same test a man takes!
The idiocy of this should be apparent (hence why I shouldn't need to state it except for those who are ruled by their emotion instead of their logic apparently), but again to state the obvious, are wars less dangerous because women are soldiers? Are fires less dangerous and those people that need rescued going to made easier because it's a woman firefighter? Are criminals going to be tamer and less dangerous because the police officer is female? Of course NOT! In fact...I as a male would never even think of becoming a police officer because I honestly doubt if I went up against a hardened criminal they would be intimidated by my stature. There's something to say for being able to pass the male version of first responder tests.
Finally, I would like to point out that if I am 220lbs and passed out on the 3rd floor of a burning office building and the women they send up that ladder to lift my dead weight body down that ladder cannot effectively do it because she's not strong enough then in essence her decision to become a firefighter has put my life in danger and effects my rights as a citizen because our society has allowed a less qualified female to take the job of a more qualified male. In most cases the only reason women are able to acquire traditionally male jobs is simply because the warped (reverse discrimination laws) require the employers to hire a certain number of women. I know this first hand because as a 35 year veteran pilot the joke in the airline industry was that to get a pilot job in the airlines in the 90's was that you had to be a black female with a Mexican surname! This pretty much says it all...so no my fren...your logic doesn't hold water!
To answer your question (I shouldn't need to do this because it's obvious)...men are different (not better...different) than women. The fact that men cannot have children doesn't make women better as individuals...but they are definitely better than men (better equipped) to have children. The same exact logic can be applied to women doing a traditionally "man's job." Men are better and safer at certain things than women are because of their size, bone structure and muscle mass. If women can pass the same endurance test(s) that a man can pass in applying for say...to be a firefighter, police officer or soldier, then more power to them...however, this is not the case...the tests have been altered to make them more in tune with a female's strength...in other words, most women cannot pass the same test a man takes!
The idiocy of this should be apparent (hence why I shouldn't need to state it except for those who are ruled by their emotion instead of their logic apparently), but again to state the obvious, are wars less dangerous because women are soldiers? Are fires less dangerous and those people that need rescued going to made easier because it's a woman firefighter? Are criminals going to be tamer and less dangerous because the police officer is female? Of course NOT! In fact...I as a male would never even think of becoming a police officer because I honestly doubt if I went up against a hardened criminal they would be intimidated by my stature. There's something to say for being able to pass the male version of first responder tests.
Finally, I would like to point out that if I am 220lbs and passed out on the 3rd floor of a burning office building and the women they send up that ladder to lift my dead weight body down that ladder cannot effectively do it because she's not strong enough then in essence her decision to become a firefighter has put my life in danger and effects my rights as a citizen because our society has allowed a less qualified female to take the job of a more qualified male. In most cases the only reason women are able to acquire traditionally male jobs is simply because the warped (reverse discrimination laws) require the employers to hire a certain number of women. I know this first hand because as a 35 year veteran pilot the joke in the airline industry was that to get a pilot job in the airlines in the 90's was that you had to be a black female with a Mexican surname! This pretty much says it all...so no my fren...your logic doesn't hold water!