As some may know, the SCOTUS docketed the Brunson case on June 22nd. They began hearing the case and should have a decision by Saturday June 24th. The results would lead to annulment of the 2020 Election which would dissolve the Biden Administration and the majority of Congress for not investigating the fraud of the 2020 election.
SCOTUS could have denied it on Thursday but are continuing arguments. The case was accepted under a rule 11. A rule 11 has never been docketed in this manner by anyone outside of a federal government case that was brought in the 1970's. Rule 11 means the case is of imperative public importance (SCOTUS had to decide that and docket this in that manner).
Prayers up warriors - I know the Brunson case has received many critics but this would definitely qualify as a swamp flush.
While reading the comments something came to mind. I know the brothers are/were suing some of the SCOTUS justices, but I don't know which ones. What if they are/were suing them so they could not be part of the "election" case? Wouldn't they have to recuse themselves from any case involving the brothers if they're being sued by them? If so, wouldn't that have been a strategic move by the brothers, again depending on which justices they are suing?