We suspect Q is connected to military intelligence, but it is not definitely established. If Q can't disclose information (including conclusions) obtained through their methods, then why is Q disclosing it? If anons are supposed to dig for information, where is the evidence? It is almost like Q pronouncements are Holy Writ. Who cares about verification, when we can take it for granted?

A good example is the mysterious missile launch from Puget Sound. Plenty of opining about what it was, most of which was nonsense (e.g., that it was fired at Air Force One). My own analysis, as far as I was able to take it (before being interrupted), was that its launch azimuth was approximately due north. The implication was that it may have been an attempt to spook the Russians with a not-so-false-flag attack. Supposedly, the SLBM was intercepted with a "package" purpose designed for the task. (Implying that there is a fighter Cap over the sub base at all times, to guard against an erroneous launch.) I think I put it on view, but no one took it up. That's okay. But I walked the walk, so don't give me the talk.