I just think the whole thing is weird, as a big public distraction, but the Titanic’s connection to the creation of the FED too. It just gets me thinking about, just really how much do the WH plan on revealing to the public. Not just in recent history, but going 100 years back even, if it means telling the public the truth.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
That's the first thing that came to mind. Loads of people did not understand about the Titanic. I sure didn't until I read "Creatures of the Jekyll Island."
Used to love the movie.
And the new Cbdc economy coming which was created by the Fed. The titanic is key to all this NWO.
It’s probably the most significant event in human history.
Only if the people actually go look up info and not listen to the lying media spin the story.
It's a pretty clear way of getting Titanic back in the spotlight. My take is that bombs were planted before departure. Thomas Andrews was part of the plot and survived. His brother went on to become the prime minister of Northern Ireland. A lot of bombs in Northern Irish history too.
No connection. The Fed would have happened anyway.
There is though, there were 3 powerful men who were against the FED’s creation, and were headed to the US to stop it.
So what? Someone enlisted God to perform a mass assassination? It is impossible to prove that their presence would have made any difference. Just as it is impossible to prove that the sinking was anything bur a disastrous accident. Coincidence is not evidence of anything.
You’re clearly talking about something you know little about. God had nothing to do with its sinking. The deep state has been around for a long time, go look into it more before being dismissive about something you’re not cued in on.
If God makes icebergs, He had a hand in it. The "deep state" is not much more than a boogeyman in this pathetic theory, devoid of any substance. You don't have anything, not even a confirmed motive (supposing that someone wanted to kill 3 people is only your imagination at work). All the gingerbread claims have been debunked by hard facts. I've read two books on the subject, and you haven't refuted a single fact I have mentioned.
It is a better theory to say that the sinking was a divine rebuke to whomever made the claim "God alone can sink this ship."