I always feel bad that he didn't live to see this. Or did he? LOL just wishful thinking prolly.
Q post 918 Makes me think someday we will know. Somebody remind me how to embed.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 5b7643 No.614093 📁 Mar 10 2018 14:05:58 (EST) Anonymous ID: 478545 No.613796 📁 Mar 10 2018 13:40:33 (EST) NK Trump.PNG⬇
I swear Trump is killing me here. HAHA He keeps putting out clues he has already talked to Kim
613796 You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q
I think it's the spirit of Jesus Christ that animates Q. God must get the glory in the end.
an Angelic Being on special assignment.
I would be careful. God says that he is done giving written revelation unto man. This would be the second Bible if Q were God, which would have violated what he said before. I’m sure people here may believe translating is to blame etc. and therefore I’m wrong. I would retort that among the multiple translations out there (and you can use a “blue letter Bible” to self verify), this assumption and accusation is baseless and retarded.
I think Gods involvement in Q, is using it as a means to an end, just like preaching or miracles or even extraordinary events can change the most stubborn of hearts. Sometimes you need to hear a question and figure it out for yourself, which I think is what we should all be doing here. It’s not God directly writing to us, God places people in our path, to edify us or to challenge us. We rise through him and we fall when we are without him.
Let us then holdfast to Him and his clear Word. Let us praise Him when those in our paths edify us and glorify Him. And may the glory of everything and everyone else dimly fade away.
I agree with most of what you write here, but is Slech saying that "wait until you know who has been talking to you here" refers to the spirit of Jesus? I would emphatically disagree with that, although I agree that God is working through the Q operation, just as God is working across gazillions of multiple fronts around the world, right now. But I don't think that the Q operation is in any way related to mystical revelation from God, although it certainly does 'reveal' many earthly things.
That's an extremely literalist theological interpretation. Can I assume you are referring to the Book of Revelation? As far as I understand it, the part about not adding "Not taking away" is a reference to the Book of Revelation itself, and only that book. i.e.
"And if anyone takes away from the words of this book of prophecy...."
But who created the idea or "written revelation"? If prophecy or revelation is recorded in text, it becomes "written".
As far as I know, there is nothing in the scripture that says that God is finished with revelation. Quite the opposite.
The idea that we know it all, and that the Old and New Testaments reveal everything, and that God will not reveal more, is more rooted in a fear of being misled than in a trust in God and having a living breathing relationship with him.
"In the last days, God says, I will pour out My Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams." Acts.
In addition there is a LOT to suggest that we are in for some upgrades:
"Now we see but a dim reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known." Paul
"If I have told you about earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you about heavenly things?"
Jesus himself. "I still have much to tell you, but you cannot yet bear to hear it. However, when the Spirit of truth comes, He will guide you into all truth. For He will not speak on His own, but He will speak what He hears, and He will declare to you what is to come."
Declare what is to come.
"His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns; and He had a name written that no man knew, but He Himself."
How is it that when Christ returns, he has a name that no man knows, except he himself?
The old testament scriptures (first passed down orally by the Israelites and THEN written down, had one mission: to spread the message (remind) that Israel was chosen by God and to prepare for the arrival of Jesus. But when Jesus came, he brought a completely new level of understanding, and so the Jewish leaders rejected him.
As far as I can see, the old testament and the new testament together, AKA the Bible, has a very clear and simple mission: To share the truth of spiritual salvation through Jesus Christ and to point the way for humanity to prepare for His return.
Revelation 22:18-19
[18] I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, [19] and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.
John is the oldest writer. He would have likely been aware of the other apostles writings.
Many things described in knowing many mysteries refer to the afterlife. We have something no one in the Bible had, the complete revelation of Gods word, old and New Testament, which correlates with the old and new covenant.
Thanks for replying.
What you have written above is interpretation, and speculation. Which is fine, but don't make it out to be something that it isn't.
He clearly writes "the words of the prophecy of this book". It is called the book of revelation aka John's Revelation. It is a book of prophecy, whereas the Gospel is much, much more than a book of prophecy. In fact, more than anything, its a book of history than of prophecy.
I agree that many of the mysteries not revealed in the old and new testament pertain to the afterlife, but why are they not important? Fear of death and obsession with the material world are still massive plagues to humankind.
Today, the intellectual advancement of humanity is light years beyond what it was 2000 years ago. There are literally thousands of things that would have been incomprehensible to someone of Jesus time, which now are common knowledge and vastly accessible intellectually.
But there are myriad other things not revealed clearly by the old testament or new testament: Why did God prepare the Israelites for 2000 years if death of the Cross was required? Why is the biblical time from Adam to Abraham 2000 years, and the period from Abraham to Jesus 2000 years? Why wait so long? Why was it necessary to have salvation via the cross accomplished but then take 2000+ years to do the second coming?
We can speculate and rationalize about these things, but the clear fact is, these are examples of things that are NOT explained clearly in the scripture.
I agree that we today have something that no one recorded in the Bible had (excepting of course Jesus), and the value of that should never been dismissed or ignored.
However, whereas there is this one line in the Book of Revelation, which one can speculate about, there are many, many instances in the scripture that indicate that we do not have the whole truth.
The Israelites thought they knew everything, and they were unable to receive Jesus teaching which was on a much higher level, and this made them "stiff necked" - unable to mentally turn towards Jesus and learn from him. Is it possible that this could happen when he returns? Jesus actually indicates that this might be the case.
One last point: No one but Jesus even realized the clear instance of "second coming" at Jesus time, which he finally revealed to his disciples because the teachers of the law were challenging them saying Jesus could not be the Messiah, because the second coming of Elijah was not realized. "If he is the Messiah, then where is Elijah?"
Who does Jesus say was Elijah? Who fulfilled the second coming of Elijah? How?
We already have a very clear example of 'second coming' in the Gospels. But who is paying attention? Are we so caught up in our doctrinal interpretations that we miss the clear truth?
Thanks for replying and sharing your view.