https://slaynews.com/news/ex-who-official-raises-alarm-global-pandemic-treaty/
This includes caving to the WHO on treatments, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and government surveillance.
Under the treaty, the WHO would have the power to lock the public in their homes or censor the American people in violation of their First Amendment rights, overriding the Constitution.
Even more chillingly, the White House wants to bypass submitting this agreement for Senate approval.
The Biden admin argues that it is not an official treaty despite it having the full force of one.
In a seminal discussion before the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) in the UK, leading health experts raised serious concerns over the WHO’s new powers.
Dr. David Bell, a former WHO senior medical officer, and Professor Garrett Wallace Brown, who chairs Global Health Policy at the University of Leeds, raised the alarm over the sweeping new powers that the WHO will be granted.
They outlined how the proposals could reshape the dynamics between the WHO and its member nations and imperil critical health initiatives.
The contentious point revolves around the unprecedented authority these proposals could vest in the WHO.
According to Dr. Bell, the WHO could wield the power to demand hefty financial contributions from countries, suppress scientific discourse, and enforce travel restrictions, lockdowns, and compulsory vaccinations in response to health emergencies, which the body can declare at its discretion.
Bell explained the transformation of the WHO since its inception in 1946.
indicative of political, rather than scientific, decision-making.
Stringer stressed that the potential impact on public health, democracy, civil liberties, and individual rights necessitates rigorous debate and transparent review.
Both experts and parliamentarians conveyed the urgent need for caution and thorough analysis of the WHO’s proposed changes, calling for countries to retain autonomy in addressing public health challenges, and for the protection of global health initiatives from undue influence.
They will never get 2/3 of the states to vote for that, any other attempt will be deemed unconstitutional,. Now you see why they don't teach the constitution to your children
Treaties are approved by the Senate, not the States.
But treaties cannot override the Constitution.
You need 2/3 of the states to amend the constitution
A treaty does not amend it and are solely approved by the senate. However, if a treaty is unconstitutional its null and void. But that doesn't really matter anymore (eg: "covid") does it?
I didn't say a treaty could amend the constitution teach. I am perfectly aware what it takes to legally curb our rights.